Why is it easier to throw someone with a judo throw?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarsh5
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Judo throws require significantly less effort than lifting an opponent due to the principles of center of balance (COB) and center of gravity (COG). The lever action involved in judo techniques, such as the ogoshi throw, allows the attacker to manipulate the opponent's weight distribution, making it easier to execute a throw. This dynamic interplay of forces and balance is crucial in judo and is applicable in various fields, including engineering and control systems. Mastery of timing and dynamics is essential for effective judo techniques, as demonstrated by fighters like Ronda Rousey and Demian Maia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of center of balance (COB) and center of gravity (COG)
  • Familiarity with judo techniques, specifically the ogoshi throw
  • Basic knowledge of lever mechanics and torque
  • Awareness of dynamics in control systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of judo throws and their applications in martial arts
  • Study the physics of levers and torque in relation to balance
  • Explore control systems dynamics in engineering
  • Watch instructional videos on judo techniques to observe timing and execution
USEFUL FOR

Martial artists, judo practitioners, sports scientists, and anyone interested in the physics of movement and balance in combat sports.

utkarsh5
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
why is it easier to "throw" someone with a judo throw?

in judo,when we throw out opponents,the effort needed to throw them is significantly less then what one would expect.it is easier to throw a person with a judo throw than normally picking them up,moving them to the same distance,and then releasing them.why is that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's all to do with centre of balance, essentially it's a lever action. Imagine a plank of wood balanced on a point in the middle. On one side is a 99kg weight, on the other a 100kg weight. To lift the 100kg side off of the floor one just has to apply >1kg of downward force onto the 99kg side.

Consider something simple like http://judoinfo.com/images/animations/blue/ogoshi.htm; the opponent is pulled forward slightly to bring them off balance, then they are pulled onto the attackers hip at their midrift bending forward (like the plank on the point). The weight of their legs (like the 100kg weight) is pulled up by the action of their upper body falling foward (like the 99kg weight) over the attacker. Does that make sense?
 


i think i get it now.the torqques on both sides of the fulcrum cancel out each other.this is very much similar to all the torques balancing each other about the centre of gravity.are the COB and the COG same thing?if they are,then can centre of gravity have interesting practical applications like this?(because most of them are just balancing things on things)
 


Not sure what you mean by COB and COG but yes this type of thing is used all the time in fields such as engineering and construction.
 


COB-centre of balance
COG-centre of gravity
 


I think there is more to it than simple stability, as in stopping a bus from toppling over. I reckon it's probably far more to do with the dynamics of 'control systems'. If you can sneak some spurious feedback signal into your opponent's balance system, he or she will almost throw themselves down. Let's face it, you can make someone fall over in a flight simulator when the rams are actually switched off.
Good fighters (any discipline) are working on timing and dynamics more than just brute strength. They probably haven't analysed what they're actually doing, of course - it 'just works' for them.
 


thank you for the answers!
 


If you want to see some sick Judo throws in a real fight watch Ronda Rousey in Strikeforce. Also see a beautiful maneuver from Demian Maia against Chael Sonnen. These will give you a great perspective.

Get into Judo, lots of fun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K