Why is it poissible to look at the sun without damage.

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter datacloud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damage Sun The sun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experiences and perceptions of individuals regarding the ability to look directly at the sun without apparent damage to vision. Participants explore the potential physiological effects, the role of atmospheric particles, and the implications of personal anecdotes versus established scientific understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their ability to look at the sun without experiencing vision impairment, noting a cycle of visual phenomena they find awe-inspiring.
  • Another participant warns that the described experience may be flash blindness and could lead to long-term damage, urging caution.
  • A participant questions the role of atmospheric particles in screening harmful UV light, suggesting they may contribute to the ability to look at the sun.
  • Some participants argue that the experience of clearer vision after looking away from the sun contradicts known physiological responses, suggesting it may indicate eye damage instead.
  • There is a discussion about the validity of personal experiences versus established scientific knowledge, with some participants emphasizing the importance of existing research on solar observation and eye health.
  • One participant expresses a willingness to take risks for potential discoveries, while others challenge this logic, arguing that it disregards extensive prior research.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of anecdotal evidence in the context of scientific inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the safety and implications of looking at the sun. While some share personal experiences that suggest no harm, others emphasize the risks and the importance of adhering to established scientific understanding.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the tension between personal anecdotal experiences and established scientific consensus on the dangers of solar observation. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of human perception and the potential for misinterpretation of visual experiences.

datacloud
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I was astonished recently to find myself able to look directly into the sun without experiencing impairment of vision as a result. I have done so many times since but there are occasions when the light is too bright. What I saw when I looked at the sun was quite awe inspiring. The outer rim would turn gold and send spirals of colour outwards and then all would be obliterated by a bright white flash. This cycle repeated and I cannot understand how this is even possible that I could have such an experience. Having said that I am aware of the existence of particles in the lower atmosphere presently that may be screening the UV light. Does anybody know of a policy to protect us from harmful solar explosions by the use of nanoparticles for example or does anybody have any explanation as to what these particles are.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Um...what you are describing is flash blindness. It is impairment of vision. In addition to momentary impairment, you may also be doing long-term damage. Stop looking directly at the sun.
 
I totally understand what flash damage is and that has always been the deterrent to sun gazing. There are times when flash damage occurs and of course I refrain from looking, I am not stupid. However I will take your advice, but can I say that I have been sun-gazing for over a month and the startling thing is that on looking away, there is not the smallest trace of flash damage, quite the opposite. Immediately after averting my gaze from the sun my vision is clearer and brighter than it was previously almost as though a new vista has opened up and the light had filled my entire head. I am 56 yrs old and to be honest I would prefer to take a few chances and maybe break some new ground rather than limit myself to what I feel, is an extremely restricted scope of sensory experience that modern man finds himself with.
 
datacloud said:
Immediately after averting my gaze from the sun my vision is clearer and brighter than it was previously almost as though a new vista has opened up and the light had filled my entire head. I am 56 yrs old and to be honest I would prefer to take a few chances and maybe break some new ground...

This doesn't make sense physically. If you're staring at the sun, your pupils will shrink to try to limit the amount of light that your eyes accept (The anti instant blindness mechanism). After looking away you should not see anything clearer, and certainly not brighter unless there is serious eye damage. The new vista opening and light filling your head is almost certainly causing permanent eye damage.
 
Thanks for the link phyzguy and yes, it re-iterates the dangers but look, the other part of my question may be crucial. Is it the particles that are now floating about in the lower atmosphere that are resposible for attenuating the harmful UV light.
 
Mostly the Ozone layer. But yes, all atmosphere absorbs some amount of light.
 
datacloud said:
I am 56 yrs old and to be honest I would prefer to take a few chances and maybe break some new ground rather than limit myself to what I feel, is an extremely restricted scope of sensory experience that modern man finds himself with.

I just can't get my head around this logic. That's like saying "I'd rather smash my hand with a hammer in case there is some revolutionary discovery to be gained by it". I don't mean to sound flippant but you are risking your sight on the off chance that millions of manhours of research in the fields of solar physics, optics, ophthalmology etc have overlooked some drastic discovery that could be made just by staring at the sun.

Whilst I applaud you doing a bit of experimentation yourself I would implore you to learn from what is currently known rather than partaking in a dangerous activity. You'll probably find there is far more information than you ever dreamed of that can answer your questions.
 
Hello Ryan M B. re "That's like saying "I'd rather smash my hand with a hammer in case there is some revolutionary discovery to be gained by it". I agree that such an action would hgo beyond the bounds of sensible behaviour by our current standards. Let us never forget how standards are in constant flux, what we think is wrong now may turn around at some point in future. The good thing about science is the discovery of truth and many beliefs from the past that were integral parts of religious belief and faith have been proven not to be correct. Any Normality exists on a sliding scale and is determined by culture. So, you might think it was crazy but what if in doing so I did make an amazing ground breaking discovery. I would be hailed a hero for using myself as the guinea pig. Anyway I am not that daft. I have spent a lifetime avoiding direct eye contact with the sun simply because in the past one has suffered severe after effects. If I felt any danger I would refrain and I will on the basis of your advice but heck, something has changed to make even the most momentary glimpse possible. I spent about one hour looking at it some time ago and like I say, if anything my eyesight has improved. That is an incontrvertable fact.
 
  • #10
dacruick said:
This doesn't make sense physically. If you're staring at the sun, your pupils will shrink to try to limit the amount of light that your eyes accept (The anti instant blindness mechanism). After looking away you should not see anything clearer, and certainly not brighter unless there is serious eye damage. The new vista opening and light filling your head is almost certainly causing permanent eye damage.
I promise you that this is an absolute fact. I can say no more than that. My eyes absorbed the rays and brightened my visual outlook. You can test me if you like. I should say that my eyesight is pretty poor to begin with. My right eye has been lazy since childhood and I need glasses to read etc.
 
  • #11
datacloud said:
Hello Ryan M B. re "That's like saying "I'd rather smash my hand with a hammer in case there is some revolutionary discovery to be gained by it". I agree that such an action would hgo beyond the bounds of sensible behaviour by our current standards.
The standards for science are very good. One person looking at the sun and reporting effects without prior knowledge or expertise does not fulfil them.
datacloud said:
So, you might think it was crazy but what if in doing so I did make an amazing ground breaking discovery. I would be hailed a hero for using myself as the guinea pig.
I disagree, I suspect you would be seen as a lucky fool (no offence intended). Regardless you are ignoring the fact that you are not investigating a new phenomenon, there are mountains of data regarding the sun, optics and the human eye.
datacloud said:
If I felt any danger I would refrain and I will on the basis of your advice but heck, something has changed to make even the most momentary glimpse possible. I spent about one hour looking at it some time ago and like I say, if anything my eyesight has improved. That is an incontrvertable fact.
It isn't incontrovertible because there is no evidence for it (sorry but personal anecdote doesn't count). Honestly, what do you expect to discover from this dangerous activity that wouldn't have been noted by all the research ever done on the topic? This is crazy logic. I don't mean to be offensive and I applaud your curiosity but there are better ways to going about things. Look up the sun, vision and all these other things. Staring into the sun by yourself is nothing knew and you should read up on what is known rather than damaging your eyes for no reason.
 
  • #12
datacloud said:
I promise you that this is an absolute fact.
No. Facts are things verifiable and verified by independent sources.

What you have there is a perception. And perception - especially when you push the leaky edges of performance of your faculties - is fallible.

You are surely experiencing something that may seem like clearer vision, but it may or may not be so - like datacloud's example of how good it feels after you stop banging your head with a hammer.

What is a fact is that you are damaging your eyes.
 
  • #13
This topic is foolish and dangerous and it's closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K