Why is it so accepted that matter falls into black holes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes, specifically addressing why it is commonly accepted that matter falls into them. Participants explore various hypotheses regarding the behavior of matter near black holes, including the possibility of matter being expelled rather than consumed, the implications of escape velocity, and the role of event horizons.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that black holes could expel matter instead of consuming it, suggesting that matter might be torn apart and then blasted back into space.
  • Others argue that black holes are defined by their gravitational strength, which exceeds the speed of light, leading to questions about how material from quasars can escape.
  • A participant mentions that light from quasars originates from outside the event horizon, where strong radiation and jets can occur due to interactions with matter before it reaches the horizon.
  • There is a challenge regarding the assertion that black holes take in more matter than they can handle, with one participant questioning the validity of this claim.
  • Some participants discuss the nature of the event horizon, stating that once something crosses it, it cannot escape, and inquire about the implications for matter falling into black holes.
  • Hawking radiation is introduced as a mechanism by which black holes can lose mass, although it is clarified that this does not involve particles escaping from beyond the event horizon.
  • There are theoretical discussions about the behavior of matter at and beyond the event horizon, including the concept of tidal forces and the inevitability of reaching a singularity.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the necessity of matter passing the event horizon, suggesting alternative models where matter could be shredded and expelled without crossing it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the behavior of matter in relation to black holes, with no consensus reached on whether matter is definitively consumed or expelled.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of black holes and the event horizon, with some participants relying on theoretical models that may not be universally accepted. There are also unresolved questions regarding the mechanisms of radiation and the fate of matter near black holes.

  • #31
cterry86 said:
couldn't the dip made by a black hole create a lensing effect that locks light into an "orbit" around the hole past the EH?

This is a cool idea. Also, wouldn't light that is close but not beyond the event horizon experience strong lensing as well? There are cases when astronomers see duplicate images of galaxies due to strong gravitational lensing so it seems like a black hole would create a significant observational distortion. Maybe some of the objects we see swirling around black holes are figments of distortion.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
I am probably totally wrong here but...

Imagine you just made your bed. You reach down at the exact center of the sheet and ball it up in your fist. When you do that the part of the sheet outside of your fist gets wrinkles and waves. All of the wrinkles and waves have troughs that start at your fist and extend out away from it. Now flip that picture upside down and imagine that sheet is very rigid. Pick any wave and put a bb in it. It can't climb the wave and get out because it doesn't have enough energy. It can only roll down toward your fist. The steeper the slope from flat sheet to your fist, the more energy it would take for the bb to roll up and out. Gravity kind of works like that, The bigger an object is the deeper the "dent" it makes in space. Esentially a steeper slope that you have to fight to get away from it.


Now with a black hole, it hase the deep dent of at least the mass of a large star, but all that weight on the sheet is focused at a single point. Imagine you made a dent in a sheet with a BB that weighed as much as a bowling ball.

Thats the way i visualize it in my head since its a 2D sheet bending into a 3rd dimension. I assume, again just guessing, that the distortion of space is exponentially more complex than that simple picture.


Now for light not getting out because its velocity isn't great enough I take that picture of a heavy BB in the center of a crumbled sheet and twist the sheet around. That takes all those paths and twists them up. Then I imagine that its twisted so much that no matter how hard you roll a lighter bb it either can't get up the twisted ramp at all or when it gets to the end of its twisted ramp and almost out it ends up at the mouth of the next ramp which directs it back down toward out heavier BB.

I'm not educated in the field but after a lot of reading and seeing different graphics on black holes and large bodies in space this picture makes sense to me when I am reading and tying to imagine what's going on. A friend of mine who is a graduate student in physics said the best way he could explain it to me so I could actually understand it was that the geometery of space time inside the EH was such that light can't find a path out. The space is warped in a way that it kind of curls back into itself. So if a photon thinks its going straight and heading for the EH its actually following a curved path that will never reach the EH.


Keep in mind he was trying to convey in words something he said is really better defined mathematically, and to top it off explaining it to someone who really won't actually understand it without understanding the math.

Hope that helps and if it doesn't I'd love for someone to tell me where I am going wrong.
 
  • #33
tkav1980 said:
I am probably totally wrong here but...

Imagine you just made your bed. You reach down at the exact center of the sheet and ball it up in your fist. When you do that the part of the sheet outside of your fist gets wrinkles and waves. All of the wrinkles and waves have troughs that start at your fist and extend out away from it. Now flip that picture upside down and imagine that sheet is very rigid. Pick any wave and put a bb in it. It can't climb the wave and get out because it doesn't have enough energy. It can only roll down toward your fist. The steeper the slope from flat sheet to your fist, the more energy it would take for the bb to roll up and out. Gravity kind of works like that, The bigger an object is the deeper the "dent" it makes in space. Esentially a steeper slope that you have to fight to get away from it. Now with a black hole, it hase the deep dent of at least the mass of a large star, but all that weight on the sheet is focused at a single point. Imagine you made a dent in a sheet with a BB that weighed as much as a bowling ball.

Thats the way i visualize it in my head since its a 2D sheet bending into a 3rd dimension. I assume, again just guessing, that the distortion of space is exponentially more complex than that simple picture. Now for light not getting out because its velocity isn't great enough I take that picture of a heavy BB in the center of a crumbled sheet and twist the sheet around. That takes all those paths and twists them up. Then I imagine that its twisted so much that no matter how hard you roll a lighter bb it either can't get up the twisted ramp at all or when it gets to the end of its twisted ramp and almost out it ends up at the mouth of the next ramp which directs it back down toward out heavier BB.

I'm not educated in the field but after a lot of reading and seeing different graphics on black holes and large bodies in space this picture makes sense to me when I am reading and tying to imagine what's going on. A friend of mine who is a graduate student in physics said the best way he could explain it to me so I could actually understand it was that the geometery of space time inside the EH was such that light can't find a path out. The space is warped in a way that it kind of curls back into itself. So if a photon thinks its going straight and heading for the EH its actually following a curved path that will never reach the EH. Keep in mind he was trying to convey in words something he said is really better defined mathematically, and to top it off explaining it to someone who really won't actually understand it without understanding the math.

Hope that helps and if it doesn't I'd love for someone to tell me where I am going wrong.

Remove the part about all the folds and waves. The funnel is a perfectly smooth curve, thus:
[URL]http://www.timeenoughforlove.org/images/blackhole6.jpg[/URL]Also, it's not that light can't "find" a way out, it's that all paths (which are smooth curves) lead back into the BH, rather than outward.

(One path passes outside the EH, the path crosses the EH, and as such will never cross it again.) (EH not shown).
[URL]http://www.strings.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~bigdraw/penrose/funnel-main.jpg[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
I just wanted to point out that Daves picture is just a 2d visual representation of the concept. In reality spacetime is not curved "down" or "up" and massive objects don't make dents in 2d sheets. Or trampolines. So don't imagine a large object above that funnel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
13K