Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why is kinetic energy not a vector

  1. Dec 24, 2007 #1
    Why is kinetic energy not a vector, though it uses velocity in its definition of : K = 1/2mv^2
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 24, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Imagine 4 particles. One traveling 10m/s to the north, one 10 m/s to the south, one 10 m/s to the east, and one 10 m/s to the west. Is there any reason they should have different energies from each other? No of course not. There is no special preference given to any spatial direction. So kinetic energy does not depend on direction, hence it must be a scalar, not a vector. There is nothing that prohibits defining scalars in terms of vectors, although incidentally, the v in kinetic energy is speed (|v|, a scalar), not velocity.
  4. Dec 24, 2007 #3


    User Avatar

    KE is a magnitude. Momentum would be a vector. Why is the distance between two points not a vector? Same reason KE isn't.
  5. Dec 24, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Actually, it is defined as the work required to make a stationary particle of mass m to move at velocity v, where v is velocity. See here for more information.
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2007
  6. Dec 24, 2007 #5


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Your confused with the difference between velocity and speed. Kinetic energy does not use velocity in the equation you stated. That equation uses speed, the magnitude of a velocity vector. Since the magnitude of a vector is a scalar, there is no vector term in the kinetic energy equation.

    Also, as Hootenanny pointed out, that is not the definition of kinetic energy. See his post for more info.
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2007
  7. Dec 24, 2007 #6


    Staff: Mentor

    The change in kinetic energy is equal to the work done by a conservative force. So KE and work must have the same units and type. Work is the dot product of force and displacement. Force and displacement are vectors, and the dot product of two vectors is a scalar. Therefore KE must also be a scalar. In fact, another way to write the expression for KE is 1/2 m v.v which makes it clear that it is a scalar.

    The square of a vector quantity is almost always actually the dot product of the vector with itself, a scalar quantity.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Why is kinetic energy not a vector