Why is Muon Charge Ratio Positive?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dt19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Muon Ratio
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the observed charge ratio of muons produced by cosmic radiation, specifically why there are slightly more positive muons than negative ones. Participants explore various theoretical and experimental aspects related to this phenomenon, including the influence of cosmic ray composition, decay processes, and environmental factors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the charge of incident cosmic rays, primarily protons or alpha particles, is overwhelmingly positive, which may influence the muon charge ratio.
  • Others propose that the Earth's magnetospheric field polarity could affect the east-west ratio of muons due to the Lorentz force acting on charged particles.
  • A participant notes that negative muons tend to decay or be captured more frequently than positive muons, which might contribute to the observed charge ratio.
  • Some contributions mention that muons produced from pions and kaons have different decay characteristics, with kaons potentially increasing the charge ratio at high energies.
  • One participant references a measurement indicating a charge ratio of approximately 1.37, consistent with predictions related to kaon decay asymmetry at high energies.
  • Monte-Carlo simulations are mentioned, suggesting that the production ratio of K+ to K- contributes significantly to the positive muon dominance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the reasons behind the positive muon charge ratio, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached on the primary factors influencing this phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific experimental conditions, such as the energy range of muons and the influence of the geomagnetic field, which may not be universally applicable. Additionally, the discussion includes references to various papers that provide differing interpretations of the data.

dt19
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Could anyone explain to me why it is that cosmic radiation supplies slightly more positive than negative muons? I know that negative muons disappear a little faster than the positive ones as they can decay or be captured, but I don't know if this would have any impact on what I'm asking.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a paper I found on Google:
http://www.cosmic-ray.org/papers/icrc733-1833.pdf

There are several possible reasons for a small charge asymmetry:
1) Charge of incident cosmic ray (proton or alpha) is overwhelmingly positive.
2) Does the Earth's magnetospheric field polarity matter? Probably will affect the east-west ratio (Lorentz force qv x B).
3) Negative muons rarely do not decay, even in muonic nitrogen and oxygen. They ~never form muonic atoms before stopping. For negative muons captured in iron or higher. most muons are absorbed.
4) CP violating K-decay modes?
5) There is a very very slight dE/dx Bethe-Bloch range asymmetry in stopping +/- muons.
I am puzzled if there is a significant effect. Hadronic showers create muons mostly via pion or kaon decay.
Bob S

[added] See Phys. Rev. D 74, 082006 (2006) [8 pages]
The charge ratio of the atmospheric muons at low energy
The effect is attributed to the geomagnetic field.
 
Last edited:
The charge ratio obtained for muons coming from pious produced in proton
interactions was Zpπ+ it /Zpπ- = 1.46. Muons from kaons tend to increase the charge ratio,
and hadronic cascades in the atmosphere tend to decrease it, as do neutrons present in
primary nuclei.
from paper cited by Bob S.

I would expect it has to do with the overwhelmingly positive charge of incident cosmic rays (protons) which strike ordinary matter (protons and neutrons). It would seem to factor production of π+ and K+. That seems to be a conclusion in the paper.
 
Here is another newer measurement:
http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v76/i5/e052003
indicating a μ+- charge ratio ≈1.37, consistent with kaon decay asymmetry predictions at very high energies.
Phys. Rev. D 76, 052003 (2007) [16 pages]
Measurement of the atmospheric muon charge ratio at TeV energies with the MINOS detector
Abstract
P. Adamson et al. MINOS Collaboration

The 5.4 kton MINOS far detector has been taking charge-separated cosmic ray muon data since the beginning of August, 2003 at a depth of 2070 m.w.e. in the Soudan Underground Laboratory, Minnesota, USA. The data with both forward and reversed magnetic field running configurations were combined to minimize systematic errors in the determination of the underground muon charge ratio. When averaged, two independent analyses find the charge ratio underground to be Nμ+/Nμ-=1.374±0.004(stat)-0.010+0.012(sys). Using the map of the Soudan rock overburden, the muon momenta as measured underground were projected to the corresponding values at the surface in the energy range 1–7 TeV. Within this range of energies at the surface, the MINOS data are consistent with the charge ratio being energy independent at the 2 standard deviation level. When the MINOS results are compared with measurements at lower energies, a clear rise in the charge ratio in the energy range 0.3–1.0 TeV is apparent. A qualitative model shows that the rise is consistent with an increasing contribution of kaon decays to the muon charge ratio.

Bob S
 
Monte-Carlo multi-particle-transport-simulation-code FLUKA simulations of cosmic ray showers show that the μ+- ratio >1.3 is due largely to the production ratio of strangeness +1 K+ to strangeness -1 K-, which decay (usually by charged pions) to μ+ and μ- respectively. See Fig. 2 in
http://www.srl.utu.fi/AuxDOC/kocharov/ICRC2009/pdf/icrc0177.pdf
Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K