Why Is My Calculation of Magnetic Potential Energy Incorrect?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of magnetic potential energy using the formula U = -\vec \mu \cdot \vec B. The original poster attempts to find the angle between the magnetic moment and the magnetic field vectors, which is necessary for calculating potential energy. There is confusion regarding the correct application of the formula and the interpretation of variables involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the magnetic moment and the magnetic field, questioning the angle derived from the dot product. There is also a mention of using partial derivatives in the context of work done in three dimensions, leading to further inquiries about the meaning of distance in this context.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on understanding the concept of work and potential energy, while others express confusion about the definitions and calculations involved. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the original poster's approach without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the relative nature of potential energy and the choice of origin in calculations, which may not have been explicitly defined in the problem. Participants are navigating through various interpretations of the problem's requirements and the definitions of terms used.

exitwound
Messages
291
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Capture.JPG


Homework Equations



U = -\vec \mu \cdot \vec B

The Attempt at a Solution



As you can see, I calculated \mu = 4.08x10-3 and got the torque on the loop which is shown in the answer above.

The potential energy is defined above as

U = -\vec \mu \cdot \vec B = -\mu B\cos\theta

I have to find the angle between the two vectors which I can do using:

\frac{\vec \mu \cdot \vec B}{|\mu||B|} = cos \theta

But what I came up with wasn't right.

From the first part, \mu \vec n = (4.08x10^-3)(.6\hat i -.8 \hat j) = 2.45x10^-3 \hat i - 3.27x10^-3 \hat j


If:
Code:
μx = 2.45e-3          Bx = .25
μy = -3.27e-3        By = 0
μz = 0                  Bz = .3
--------------------------
|\mu|^2 = (2.45x10^-3)^2 + (-3.27x10^-3)^2
|\mu| = 4.09x10^-3

|B|^2 = (.25)^2 + (.3)^2
|B| = 3.91x10^-1

\vec \mu \cdot \vec B = \mu_xB_x + \mu_yB_y + \mu_zB_z
\frac{\mu_xB_x + \mu_yB_y + \mu_zB_z}{\mu B} = cos \theta

When I put in the numbers, I get 66.8 degrees between the two vectors. Putting this back into the U = -\vec \mu \cdot \vec B = -\mu B\cos\theta equation gives the wrong answer.

Where's the mistake(s)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W = F.d = Fx*dx + Fy*dy + Fz*dz. No need to find the angle.
 
What's Dx Dy and Dz??
 
Those are partial derivatives. To take a partial derivative with respect to x (dx), you hold the y and z terms constant and then take the derivative with respect to x as if it were the only variable.

For dx + dy + dz you do this for all three variables and then add up all the derivatives you found. This tells you the slope in all three directions, which is necessary for a three-dimensional problem.

He's saying that you can calculate the potential energy of the field by considering the force that an imaginary particle feels in the field at that point. To do this, you need to understand the force that the particle feels in each of the three directions. The force in the x direction times dx, the force in the y direction times dy, and the force in the z direction times dz. If you dot these together, you get the total potential energy.
 
I know what his response meant, but I don't know what dx is. What am I measuring "distance" of? What's the d in F dot d?
 
Pardon me for trying to help.

The d is arbitrary because potential energy is not an absolute quantity, but is relative to a chosen origin. For example, the gravitational potential energy at the surface of the Earth is not really zero since gravity is still pulling on objects there. However, in physics it is convenient to call that point zero so that you can consider how much more potential energy there is at a height h. In reality, there is no absolute definition for the potential at the surface of the Earth, so an origin must be chosen.

In problems where an origin is not explicitly defined the convention is to take the potential energy to be zero at a distance of infinity from the point of interest. Then you can think of the potential energy of the field to be the amount of work required to bring the test particle from infinity to the point of interest through the field.

Good luck.
 
Indeed. Didn't mean to come off as harsh. The internet can do that sometimes.

I think his first response has generated even more confusion than there was at the start due to its brevity.

I appreciate the help. I just don't know how to complete the problem, obviously.
 
Sorry for the brevity.
I have given the definition of the work, to avoid the direct solution.
In the given problem
μ = μx*i + μy*j +μz*k = ...?
B = Bx*i + By*j + Bz*k =...?
Now work done is
w = - μ.B = - (μx*Bx + μy*By + μz*Bz) = ...?
 
okay that worked. I'm still hazy on work in general. I never could understand it.
 
  • #10
Just think of work as the amount of energy necessary to apply a force for a certain amount of time. If you want to throw a ball 5 feet, you need a certain amount of energy (or work). To throw the ball 25 feet, you need five times as much.

After you have intuition about work as a force that you can relate to in daily life, you can apply that intuition to forces that you don't experience daily (like magnetic potentials). Start from the known to understand the unknown.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K