Why is my compound pendulum experiment not proving Rouths Rule?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Routh's Rule in a compound pendulum experiment involving a long thin bar. The user initially calculated the radius of gyration (k) using the incorrect formula k^2 = (L^2)/3, resulting in discrepancies in their measurements. EmilyM clarified that for a uniform bar, the correct formula is k^2 = (L^2)/12, which accurately finds k at the center of mass. The user confirmed that applying this correction resolved their experimental issues, leading to consistent results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compound pendulum theory
  • Familiarity with Routh's Rule and its applications
  • Basic knowledge of the parallel axis theorem
  • Proficiency in using the formula tau = 2*pi*sqrt((k^2 + h^2)/(g*h))
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Routh's Rule in detail
  • Learn about the parallel axis theorem and its implications in rotational dynamics
  • Explore advanced pendulum experiments to measure gravitational acceleration (g)
  • Investigate the effects of different shapes and materials on the radius of gyration
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, experimental physicists, and engineers involved in mechanics and dynamics, particularly those working with pendulum systems and rotational motion analysis.

EmilyM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble prooving a basic compound pendulum theory - my company makes a piece of kit designed to do just that.

In a simple experiment involving a long thin bar which is set on a knife edge and allowed to swing freely I have been changing the length of the bar and measuring the time period.

The equation is tau = 2 pi * sqrt((k^2 + h^2) / g * h) designed to enable us to find a local estimate for g (gravity) and k - the radius of gyration of the rod. Plotting a graph and rearranging the eqn into y = mx + c gives an estimation of 9.84 for gravity (very good) and 0.268 for k.

The theory for k is simple, Rouths Rule states k^2 = (L^2) / 3. This gives k = 0.528.

Help. Have redone the expt over and over with increasing accuracy to no avail. Am confident that Rouths Rule holds as is 12.7mm diameter st/st rod with L = 915mm.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
EmilyM: If you want to use tau = 2*pi*[(k^2 + h^2)/(g*h)]^0.5, then you must use k^2 = (L^2)/12, not k^2 = (L^2)/3. But if you want to use k^2 = (L^2)/3, then you must use tau = 2*pi*[(0.25*k^2 + h^2)/(g*h)]^0.5. See if this resolves your problem.
 
Oh dear! Well that's what it is then, works perfectly now - thank you so much!

Ps, tau is the letter representing time period in the textbooks/refs I've been using...
 
I should also mention, the best form for your tau formula is the one you listed in your first post (which is the same as the first tau formula I listed in my post), because it is general, and is therefore applicable to any object shape. Then, for your current, particular bar shape (a uniform bar), use k^2 = (L^2)/12.
 
I agree, and I also now understand that my experiment was finding k at the centre of mass but the original formula I was using to find theoretical k (k^2 = (L^2) / 3) is to find k at the end of the bar.

k^2 = (L^2)/12 finds k at the centre of mass and this is what i wanted. The two are ofcourse related by the parallel axis theorem so that to 'move' from k at the centre of mass to k at the end of the bar you must add on a factor which is the distance squared, in this case (L/2)^2 or (L^2)/4. Then we have k^2 = (L^2)/12 + (L^2)/4 = (L^2)/12 + 3(L^2)/12 = 4(L^2)/12 = (L^2)/3 (most people could probably have skipped a few steps there but I'm happier with the maths if i write it long hand)
 
Very well said, EmilyM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
24K