Why is My Polarized Plate Field Calculation Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Plate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a misunderstanding in calculating the polarized plate field, specifically regarding the relationship between polarization (P), permittivity (ε), and the electric field (E). The user presents their calculation but expresses confusion over its correctness. A key point raised is the potential confusion between the applied electric field and the local field, which can lead to incorrect results. Clarifying these concepts is essential for accurate calculations in electrostatics. Understanding the distinction between applied and local fields is crucial for resolving the issue.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
...
Relevant Equations
...
1620872800417.png


I am a little confused why my answer is wrong... Briefly, my answer is as follow: $$P = \epsilon_{0} X E = (\epsilon-\epsilon_{0}) E; \space \space \space \space \space \space \space E = P/(\epsilon-\epsilon_{0})$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
Homework Statement:: ...
Relevant Equations:: ...

View attachment 282969

I am a little confused why my answer is wrong... Briefly, my answer is as follow: $$P = \epsilon_{0} X E = (\epsilon-\epsilon_{0}) E; \space \space \space \space \space \space \space E = P/(\epsilon-\epsilon_{0})$$
Disclaimer: all I know about this topic is from two minutes' web search.
Are you perhaps confusing the applied field with the local field?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why is electric field at the center of a charged disk not zero?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Finding the launch velocity of a point charge in a e-field
Replies
7
Views
2K
Heat Transfer - Radiation - Net heat transfer between two mirrors
Replies
2
Views
1K
Electric field lines outside a neutral conducting spherical shell
Replies
12
Views
1K
Electric Field due a charged disk
Replies
2
Views
2K
How charge density of plate is changed by permittivity
Replies
3
Views
2K
A question about the fields D and H for fields in matter
Replies
8
Views
2K
Double Paralell Plate Capacitor with Dielectric
Replies
5
Views
2K
Understanding Electric Field of Positive & Negative Plates
Replies
2
Views
1K
Electric field in a capacitor with a dielectric
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top