Why is my TI-84 giving different results for complex number calculations?

Click For Summary
The user is experiencing discrepancies in complex number calculations on a TI-84 when converting between polar and rectangular coordinates. They calculated 6<30 by hand and obtained 5.196 + 3i, but the calculator returned 0.926 + 5.93i. The issue was identified as a setting problem, with the calculator needing to be in the correct mode for accurate results. The user confirmed that entering the angle in radians yielded the correct conversion. Ultimately, the confusion stemmed from the calculator's mode settings affecting the calculations.
1st1
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having some difficulty understanding what is going on with the TI-84 complex number calculation in switching between rectangular and polar coordinates, hopefully someone can clarify this for me. For example, take the term 6<30 (6 angle 30). When I calculate this by hand going from polar to rectangular I get 5.196 + 3i. However, if I try to switch 6<30 into rectangular coordinates with my TI-84 I get 0.926 + 5.93i. Can anyone explain to me what is happening?

Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have the calculator set to radians instead of degrees.
 
The calculator is set to degrees, not radians. I've checked.
However if I put the angle in as radians it does work.
Maybe it only works with radians even though I'm in degree mode.
 
Last edited:
rtfm
 
Ok, I figured it out thanks for the input.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
29K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K