Why is Percent Change Calculated Like This?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formula for price elasticity in economics, specifically the use of average quantity and average price in its calculation. The formula is expressed as (change in quantity / avg quantity) / (change in price / avg price). Participants clarify that using average values rather than initial values ensures that the elasticity coefficient is independent of the choice of initial state, thus providing a consistent measure of responsiveness. The conclusion emphasizes that the elasticity value indicates whether demand is elastic (>1), unit-elastic (=1), or inelastic (<1).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic economic concepts such as elasticity
  • Familiarity with the formula for price elasticity of demand
  • Proficiency in using Excel for calculations and data analysis
  • Knowledge of average values and their significance in statistical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of price elasticity on consumer behavior
  • Learn how to calculate elasticity using different methods in Excel
  • Explore the significance of elastic vs. inelastic demand in market strategies
  • Study real-world applications of price elasticity in various industries
USEFUL FOR

Economics students, market analysts, and anyone interested in understanding consumer behavior and pricing strategies will benefit from this discussion.

AAAA
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The formula for price elasticity in my micro/macroeconomics course is:
elasticity =
8b0b796ca1.png


For those unable to view the image:
(change in quantity / avg quantity)/(change in price / avg price)

My question is: Why is it that the average quantity/price is used instead of just the initial quantity/price (in reference to the part in brackets in the numerator and denominator?

In economics, the value which the equations spits out has significance:
>1 = elastic
1 = unit-elastic
<1 = inelastic

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought you would just divide by initial quantity; like how you would in a rate of change formula:
change x/change y
so [(q2-q1)/q1]/[(p2-p1)/p1]

I tried the 2 formulas on an excel spreadsheet, with the following results:
Original equation on right, my equation on the right
http://puu.sh/l4RCy/efce1c651b.png
NOTE: The value that looks to be 1 is really 0.96, with less decimals
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That expression gives the same result in both directions, so the coefficient depends on the two states only, not on the arbitrary choice which one is the "initial" state (it is not a time series).
 
mfb said:
That expression gives the same result in both directions, so the coefficient depends on the two states only, not on the arbitrary choice which one is the "initial" state (it is not a time series).
Oh, alright, cool. It makes sense because the formula is only concerned with magnitude, and not direction.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K