Why is Percent Change Calculated Like This?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for price elasticity in economics, specifically why average quantity and price are used instead of initial values. The original poster initially believed that initial quantities should be used in the calculation but found that both methods yield similar results. It was clarified that the elasticity coefficient is independent of the choice of initial state, focusing solely on the magnitude of change rather than direction. This understanding highlights the significance of using averages for a more accurate representation of elasticity. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the formula's focus on magnitude.
AAAA
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The formula for price elasticity in my micro/macroeconomics course is:
elasticity =
8b0b796ca1.png


For those unable to view the image:
(change in quantity / avg quantity)/(change in price / avg price)

My question is: Why is it that the average quantity/price is used instead of just the initial quantity/price (in reference to the part in brackets in the numerator and denominator?

In economics, the value which the equations spits out has significance:
>1 = elastic
1 = unit-elastic
<1 = inelastic

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought you would just divide by initial quantity; like how you would in a rate of change formula:
change x/change y
so [(q2-q1)/q1]/[(p2-p1)/p1]

I tried the 2 formulas on an excel spreadsheet, with the following results:
Original equation on right, my equation on the right
http://puu.sh/l4RCy/efce1c651b.png
NOTE: The value that looks to be 1 is really 0.96, with less decimals
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That expression gives the same result in both directions, so the coefficient depends on the two states only, not on the arbitrary choice which one is the "initial" state (it is not a time series).
 
mfb said:
That expression gives the same result in both directions, so the coefficient depends on the two states only, not on the arbitrary choice which one is the "initial" state (it is not a time series).
Oh, alright, cool. It makes sense because the formula is only concerned with magnitude, and not direction.

Thanks!
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top