Why is preferable the line integral than the area integral over C plan

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the preference for using line integrals over area integrals in the context of the complex plane. It explores the theoretical and geometric implications of each type of integral, as well as their applications in different scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that line integrals are preferable for integrating over contours or curves, while area integrals are used for regions, with the possibility of applying Stokes' theorem under certain conditions.
  • One participant highlights that line integrals in the complex case utilize complex multiplication, which incorporates both angles and magnitudes, providing a different geometric interpretation compared to real line integrals.
  • Another point raised is that complex line integrals can create local inverses of functions, as illustrated by the example of the complex exponential function and its branches of the logarithm.
  • It is noted that line integrals in the complex plane allow for the extraction of information about analytic functions, including their derivatives, which is not achievable in the real case.
  • One participant emphasizes that the rigidity of analytic functions enables the propagation of information along continuous paths, a property not shared by smooth real functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the term "preferable," with some asserting that both line and area integrals serve distinct purposes. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall preference and applicability of each integral type.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the conditions under which each type of integral is most effective, nor does it clarify the specific scenarios that dictate the choice between line and area integrals.

Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Why is preferable to use the line integral than the area integral over the complex plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what you mean by "preferable" here. Both are used for different purposes.
 
Line integrals are used when you ( or anyone! ) integrates over contours/curves. When you integrate
over a surface, you ( or anyone!) integrates over a region , you use surface integrals, tho you may be able
to use Stokes' thm. to integrate over a curve if the conditions are right.
 
When you do a line integral in real euclidean space you it is defined using real number multiplication, when you do a line integral in the complex case it uses complex multiplication, which takes account of angles as well as magnitudes. So there is a different geometric interpretation.

Furthermore, just as in the real case, complex line integrals let you create local inverses of your functions. For example, ##e^z## has period ##2\pi i##, so it is not 1-1. If it has an inverse ##f(x)## near ##0##, then ##f(1)=0## and ##e^{f(z)}=z## near ##z=0##. Taking derivatives gives ##1=f^{\prime}(z)e^{f(z)}=f^{\prime}(z)z##. So ##f^{\prime}(z)=\frac{1}{z}##. The analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus shows that ##f(z)=\int_{1}^{z}\frac{1}{t}dt## no matter which path you take in ##\mathbb{C}## from ##1## to ##z## as long as your path doesn't go "too far" away from ##1##. In this case, ##f## is one of the branches of the complex logarithm.

As final example, line integrals in ##\mathbb{C}## allow you to extract information about an analytic function (including its derivatives) due to my first point. This is not possible in ##\mathbb{R}##.

In summary, analytic functions are very rigid, and continuous paths allow you to take data about them at one location and propagate it elsewhere. This is not possible in the reals, since knowing information about a smooth real function at one location can give you no information about how it behaves elsewhere. Just as a path let's you carry the information, an integral can allow you to see its cumulative effect or average it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K