Why is QM (almost) local, with one exception?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tzimie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the locality of quantum mechanics (QM) and its implications, particularly in the context of unitary quantum mechanics (also known as the Many-Worlds Interpretation, MWI). It asserts that while QM appears local, the presence of entanglement presents a challenge to this notion. The conversation references Max Tegmark's work on the hierarchy of systems and their bound states, suggesting that locality may facilitate the isolation of systems, allowing them to maintain memory. The inquiry raises questions about the nature of reality as described by the Hamiltonian and its mapping into three-dimensional space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unitary quantum mechanics (MWI)
  • Familiarity with the concept of entanglement in quantum physics
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Awareness of the anthropic principle (AP) in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of entanglement on locality in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Max Tegmark's hierarchy of systems and their bound states
  • Study the anthropic principle and its relevance to quantum theory
  • Investigate the relationship between the Hamiltonian and three-dimensional spatial mapping
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of quantum theory and its implications for locality and entanglement.

tzimie
Messages
256
Reaction score
27
... except one weak exception of the entanglement?

Assuming that unitary QM (aka MWI) is a-local (c) Demystifier, and the ultimate reality is the Hamiltonian, somehow mapped into our 3D space, it is more surprising that the nature we observe is local. If would be more logical to expect multiple H->3D mapping "artifacts" manifesting here and there.

Is it explained by AP and the fact that locality allows systems to be isolated, undisturbed and hence to keep memory? May be I had missed it, but Max Tegmark ( http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219 ) has mentioned the hierarchy of systems and their bound states (which is based on AP), but not the locality.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K