Why is Specific Rotation Not a Colligative Property? Answers Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter pseudogirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Specific
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
pseudogirl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is specific rotation not a colligative property?
i just read that it depends on concentration(gm/litre)
but i feel that it should depend on molarity considering the fact that rotation is due to changes in molecular structure...do i have a point or am i just being silly ...can someone help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like you are confusing rotation with specific rotation.
 
i am sorry .i did confuse them both
so does rotation depend on number of moles per liter?this is the formula in the book

specific rotation=rotation/l*cl=length of polarimeter tube
c=concentration of optically active solution in (gm/l)why is molarity not there in the formula?
 
pseudogirl said:
so does rotation depend on number of moles per liter?

Yes.

c=concentration of optically active solution in (gm/l)

why is molarity not there in the formula?

Does it have to be there? Concentration in the definition is expressed in g/L, g/L and molarity are easily interconvertible.