Graduate Why is Tau-AB^2 not t^2 + x^2?

Click For Summary
Tau-AB^2 is equal to t^2 - x^2 due to the definition of the metric in an inertial frame of special relativity. The confusion arises from interpreting the diagram as Euclidean geometry, but it actually represents Minkowskian geometry. In Minkowski space, the relationships between time and space differ from those in Euclidean space, leading to the subtraction rather than addition of the squared terms. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the principles of special relativity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing the geometric framework when analyzing such equations.
BLevine1985
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
question about proof page 21
why is Tau-AB^2 equal to t^2 - x^2 ?It seems it should be t^2 + x^2 according to the geometry of the diagram...
 

Attachments

  • Gravitation.png
    Gravitation.png
    20.3 KB · Views: 129
Physics news on Phys.org
BLevine1985 said:
why is Tau-AB^2 equal to t^2 - x^2 ?
Because that's how the metric is defined in an inertial frame in special relativity.

BLevine1985 said:
It seems it should be t^2 + x^2 according to the geometry of the diagram...
No, because the diagram is not depicting a Euclidean geometry. It's depicting a Minkowskian geoemetry. That means you cannot interpret lines and angles in the diagram as if they were Euclidean; they aren't.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, malawi_glenn, topsquark and 1 other person
Thank you. That was very helpful!
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and berkeman
BLevine1985 said:
Thank you. That was very helpful!
You're welcome!

Also, welcome to PF!
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
573
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
954
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K