B Why is the CNO Cycle considered catalytic in stellar nucleosynthesis?

AI Thread Summary
The CNO cycle is considered catalytic in stellar nucleosynthesis because carbon is regenerated during the process, allowing it to facilitate further reactions without being consumed. The reactions in the CNO cycle are faster than those in the proton-proton (P-P) chain due to larger cross sections, which enhance the likelihood of interactions. In contrast, the P-P chain involves a weak interaction to form a deuteron from two protons, a process that occurs extremely slowly, estimated at once every few billion years. The CNO cycle's weak interactions, particularly involving nuclei like ^15O and ^13N, occur on a much shorter timescale of minutes. This efficiency in the CNO cycle makes it a more effective mechanism for stellar nucleosynthesis compared to the P-P chain.
DrLich
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
I'm trying to understand why the CNO cycle is considered catalytic in stellar nucleosynthesis. I know that carbon is regenerated in the process, but how does this make the reactions faster than the proton-proton chain?
Thanks in advance for your insights!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's not the fact that the carbon is regenerated that makes the CNO reactions faster than the P-P reaction. The reactions are faster simply because the cross sections are larger. The cross section for the P-P reaction is extremely small - so small that it is not measurable in the lab and has to be calculated. The CNO reaction is considered catalytic because (as you said) the carbon is regenerated and not used up.
 
The first step in the p-p chain is the formation of a deuteron from two protons. This involves the weak interaction, leading to the production of a neutron. If I remember correctly, the chance for a proton to take part in such a reaction is of the order of one per a few billion years.

On the other hand, the weak interactions involving the ##\rm^{15}O## and ##\rm^{13}N## nuclei proceed on the time scale of minutes. If you didn't need neutrons to build up the heavier nuclei, fusion processes could proceedly rapidly with strong and electromagnetic interactions alone.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...

Similar threads

Back
Top