B Why is the CNO Cycle considered catalytic in stellar nucleosynthesis?

AI Thread Summary
The CNO cycle is considered catalytic in stellar nucleosynthesis because carbon is regenerated during the process, allowing it to facilitate further reactions without being consumed. The reactions in the CNO cycle are faster than those in the proton-proton (P-P) chain due to larger cross sections, which enhance the likelihood of interactions. In contrast, the P-P chain involves a weak interaction to form a deuteron from two protons, a process that occurs extremely slowly, estimated at once every few billion years. The CNO cycle's weak interactions, particularly involving nuclei like ^15O and ^13N, occur on a much shorter timescale of minutes. This efficiency in the CNO cycle makes it a more effective mechanism for stellar nucleosynthesis compared to the P-P chain.
DrLich
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
I'm trying to understand why the CNO cycle is considered catalytic in stellar nucleosynthesis. I know that carbon is regenerated in the process, but how does this make the reactions faster than the proton-proton chain?
Thanks in advance for your insights!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's not the fact that the carbon is regenerated that makes the CNO reactions faster than the P-P reaction. The reactions are faster simply because the cross sections are larger. The cross section for the P-P reaction is extremely small - so small that it is not measurable in the lab and has to be calculated. The CNO reaction is considered catalytic because (as you said) the carbon is regenerated and not used up.
 
The first step in the p-p chain is the formation of a deuteron from two protons. This involves the weak interaction, leading to the production of a neutron. If I remember correctly, the chance for a proton to take part in such a reaction is of the order of one per a few billion years.

On the other hand, the weak interactions involving the ##\rm^{15}O## and ##\rm^{13}N## nuclei proceed on the time scale of minutes. If you didn't need neutrons to build up the heavier nuclei, fusion processes could proceedly rapidly with strong and electromagnetic interactions alone.
 
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top