Why is the common difference of an arithmetic sequence relatively prime to 3?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The common difference of the arithmetic sequence 106, 116, 126, ..., 996 is 10, which is relatively prime to 3. This implies that in any set of three consecutive terms from this sequence, exactly one term is divisible by 3. The reasoning is based on the properties of remainders when dividing by 3, where three possible remainders exist. If none of the three consecutive numbers is divisible by 3, one remainder must repeat, leading to a contradiction since the common difference does not allow for this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of arithmetic sequences and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of number theory, specifically divisibility and prime numbers
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic and remainders
  • Ability to analyze sequences and their characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of arithmetic sequences in greater detail
  • Explore modular arithmetic and its applications in number theory
  • Investigate the concept of relatively prime numbers and their significance
  • Examine generalizations of divisibility rules for other integers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of arithmetic sequences and divisibility.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I'm solving a problem, and the solution makes the following statement: "The common difference of the arithmetic sequence 106, 116, 126, ..., 996 is relatively prime to 3. Therefore, given any three consecutive terms, exactly one of them is divisible by 3."

Why is this statement true? Where does it come from? Is it generalizable to other numbers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are exactly three possible remainders. If none of three consecutive numbers is divisible by three, then there is a remainder ##r## that appears twice in the division by three. Say ##a = 3p + r## and ##a + b = 3q + r##. Then ##b = 3(q-p)## is divisible by three. The same holds if ##a## and ##a+2b## have the same remainder. Since three doesn't divide the common difference ##b##, there have to be all three possible remainders, i.e. exactly one of three consecutive numbers has remainder ##0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K