Why Is the Complex Conjugate Taken Again in Orthonormality Proof?

  • Thread starter Thread starter raintrek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proof of orthonormality for a complete set of states in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the role of complex conjugation in the context of Hermitian operators. The eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, denoted as H, satisfy the equations \(\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV = E_{n}\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV\) and \(\int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV = E_{m}\int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV\). The complex conjugate of the second equation is taken to facilitate the subtraction of the two integrals, ultimately leading to the conclusion that either the integral \(\int\Psi^{*}_{m}\Psi_{n}dV=0\) for \(m\neq n\) or that the eigenvalues are real, confirming orthogonality and normality of the eigenfunctions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian
  • Knowledge of complex conjugation in mathematical expressions
  • Basic integration techniques in the context of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of eigenvalue realness in quantum systems
  • Explore the concept of orthogonality in Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate normalization conditions for quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists working with quantum systems, and researchers focusing on the mathematical foundations of quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

raintrek
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I'm working through a proof of the orthormality condition for a complete set of states and am struggling with one element of it:

Consider the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian in the following way:

1: [tex]\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV = E_{n}\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV[/tex]

and

2: [tex]\int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV = E_{m}\int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV[/tex]

Taking the complex conjugate of the second (for H real) to obtain

3: [tex]\int\Psi_{n}H\Psi^{*}_{m}dV = E_{m}\int\Psi_{n}H\Psi^{*}_{m}dV[/tex]

Now subtract them:

1-3: [tex]\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV - \int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV = (E_{n} - E_{m}) \int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV[/tex]

I don't understand why the LHS of eq. 3 in this subtraction has had it's complex conjugate taken again, yet the right hand side has remained as it is in 3. Is it something to do with the Hermiticity of the Hamiltonian? Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Orthonormality can be established as follows. Start with

[tex]H\Psi_{m} = E_{m}\Psi_{m}[/tex] and

[tex]H\Psi_{n} = E_{n}\Psi_{n}[/tex].

Multiply top by [tex]\Psi^{*}_{n}[/tex] and integrate, likewise with [tex]\Psi^{*}_{m}[/tex] for the second. Complex conjugate the resulting 2nd equation and use the Hermiticity of H

[tex]\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV =\int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV[/tex]

to rewrite the left hand side. Subtracting the two equations now gives

[tex]0=(E_{m}-E^{*}_{n})\int\Psi^{*}_{m}\Psi_{n}dV.[/tex]

Now either

[tex]\int\Psi^{*}_{m}\Psi_{n}dV=0, m\neq n[/tex]

because the eigenvalues of distinct states are different, establishing orthogonality, or

[tex]E_{m}=E^{*}_{m}[/tex]

establishing that the eigenvalues are real.

Normality simply comes from normalizing the eigenfunctions so that

[tex]\int\Psi^{*}_{m}\Psi_{m}dV=1.[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K