Why is the deivative 2ln(x) is the same as that of ln(x^2)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mahmoud2011
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivatives of the logarithmic expressions 2ln(x) and ln(x^2), focusing on the implications of simplifying logarithmic functions and the importance of their domains. Participants explore the conditions under which these derivatives are considered equal and the potential oversight in textbooks regarding domain restrictions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that while the derivatives of 2ln(x) and ln(x^2) yield the same result, the domains of these functions differ, particularly for negative x.
  • One participant emphasizes that the simplification of logarithmic expressions should be approached with caution due to domain considerations.
  • Another participant points out that the derivative of 2ln(x) is valid only for x > 0, while the derivative of ln(x^2) is valid for x ≠ 0.
  • There is a suggestion that textbooks may assume x > 0 when simplifying ln(x^2) to 2ln(x), but this assumption is not always explicitly stated.
  • Participants express concern over the lack of emphasis on checking domains in textbooks when applying logarithmic laws.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the derivatives are equal under certain conditions, but they highlight that the domains of the original functions are not the same. There is no consensus on whether textbooks adequately address these domain issues.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that x > 0 for the simplification of ln(x^2) to 2ln(x), which is not always made clear in educational materials. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the implications of these assumptions.

mahmoud2011
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
In the textbooks some times they simplify the the logarithmic using logarithmic properties . But sometimes the domain of the simplified form is not the same as that of not simplified so how their derivative are equal. ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The domains of the derivatives are not equal.
 
I know but mustn't we simplify and take the derivative ,right ?
 
mahmoud2011 said:
I know but mustn't we simplify and take the derivative ,right ?

We don't have to, but we can. However note that 2log(x) is not a simplification of log(x^2) for negative x.
 
That is what I am talking about.
 
mahmoud2011 said:
In the textbooks some times they simplify the the logarithmic using logarithmic properties . But sometimes the domain of the simplified form is not the same as that of not simplified so how their derivative are equal. ??

They are the same. The derivative of 2*ln(x) = 2/x.

The derivative of ln(x^2) = (1/x^2) * 2x = 2/x.
 
mahmoud2011 said:
That is what I am talking about.
Yep I can see that Mahmoud. :smile:

Yes you make a good point. I sometimes see them treated as being identical when as you point out they are not.

\frac{d}{dx} \left( 2 \log_e(x) \right) = \frac{2}{x} \,\,\,\,\,\,:\,\,\,\, x>0

whereas

\frac{d}{dx} \left(\log_e(x^2) \right) = \frac{2}{x} \,\,\,\,\,\,:\,\,\,\, x \neq 0
 
uart said:
Yep I can see that Mahmoud. :smile:

Yes you make a good point. I sometimes see them treated as being identical when as you point out they are not.

\frac{d}{dx} \left( 2 \log_e(x) \right) = \frac{2}{x} \,\,\,\,\,\,:\,\,\,\, x>0

whereas

\frac{d}{dx} \left(\log_e(x^2) \right) = \frac{2}{x} \,\,\,\,\,\,:\,\,\,\, x \neq 0

Isn't the point just that the original functions 2log(x) and log(x^2) have different domains? This question really has nothing to do with derivatives. But it's a good point ... you can't arbitrarily apply the log laws without double-checking the domains.
 
Thanks for you all . Every time I use logarithmic laws I check the domains but my textbook doesn't mention that.
 
  • #10
If your textbook simplifies ln(x2) to 2 ln(x), they are probably making the assumption that x > 0. If they don't show that assumption anywhere, then they are being very sloppy.
 
  • #11
Mark44 said:
If your textbook simplifies ln(x2) to 2 ln(x), they are probably making the assumption that x > 0. If they don't show that assumption anywhere, then they are being very sloppy.

No , this problem doesn't exist but I wanted to say that why the textbook didn't mention that I must check the domains , Is the author wants me to do it myself and actually I did.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K