Why is the Gaussian function easier to integrate using polar coordinates?

5 replies · 3K views · last reply
g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Printed textbook page, section 4 Gaussian function: defines f(x) = exp{-(x - X)^2/2σ^2} with constants X and σ, a function symmetric about x = X that decreases rapidly as |x - X| grows, and notes it is convenient for representing a wave function ψ(x), with X = 0 taken for simplicity.

Two equations, numbered 17 and 18, giving the integrals from negative infinity to infinity of exp(-x^2/2σ^2) dx = √(2π)σ and of x^2 exp(-x^2/2σ^2) dx = √(2π)σ^3.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Looking at equations 17 and 18, I don't see how that follows. If you substitute infinity for x you're going to get infinity divided by some real number which is infinity
 
Hey g.lemaitre.

The first result is not intuitive and it is based on what is calle the error function or erf(x). The function does converge because e^(-x) when x gets really large goes quickly to 0.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_function

For the second one, you need to use a substitution of u = x^2. If you have done a year of calculus, this should be straight-forward.
 
g.lemaitre said:
Looking at equations 17 and 18, I don't see how that follows. If you substitute infinity for x you're going to get infinity divided by some real number which is infinity

[itex]e^{- \infty}=0[/itex]

chiro said:
Hey g.lemaitre.

The first result is not intuitive and it is based on what is called the error function or erf(x). The function does converge because e^(-x) when x gets really large goes quickly to 0.

There is no need for the error function when evaluating the first integral, just use the fact that [itex]\int_{ - \infty }^{ \infty } f(x)dx = \int_{ - \infty }^{ \infty } f(y)dy[/itex] to calculate the square of the integral, by switching to polar coordinates.
 
Do you mean ydx and xdy instead of f(x)dx f(y)dy? Sorry to nitpick but changing x to y is change a dummy variable change rather than a variable description change.
 
chiro said:
Do you mean ydx and xdy instead of f(x)dx f(y)dy? Sorry to nitpick but changing x to y is change a dummy variable change rather than a variable description change.

The whole point is to exploit a change of the "dummy" integration variable, to transform the problem from one of finding a one-dimensional integral, to one of finding a two-dimensional integral, as the latter turns out to be easier:

[tex]\left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)dx \right)^2 = \left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)dx \right)\left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(y)dy \right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)f(y)dxdy[/tex]

To see why it's easier, just switch to polar coordinates.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
The whole point is to exploit a change of the "dummy" integration variable, to transform the problem from one of finding a one-dimensional integral, to one of finding a two-dimensional integral, as the latter turns out to be easier:

[tex]\left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)dx \right)^2 = \left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)dx \right)\left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(y)dy \right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)f(y)dxdy[/tex]

To see why it's easier, just switch to polar coordinates.

That makes it a lot clearer. Thanks.