Why is the helicity of a neutrino unchanged by the weak interaction?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 3K views
Final
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi...

Consider a neutrino with a Dirac mass [tex]m_\nu[/tex] and the weak interaction

[tex]{\cal{L}}=\frac{g}{2 \sqrt{2}} \sum_l[{W_{\mu}^+ \cdot \bar{\psi}_{\nu_l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_l + W_{\mu}^- \cdot \bar{\psi}_{l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_{\nu_l} }\right{]} + \frac{g}{4 \cos(\theta_w)} <br /> \sum_l Z_{\mu}[ \bar{\psi}_{\nu_l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_{\nu_l} +\bar{\psi}_{l} \gamma^{\mu}(a+b\gamma_5)\psi_{l} ][/tex]
Why this interaction doesn't change the helicity of the neutrino? It is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any elements in that interaction that have a left-handed neutrino on one side of the operator and a right-handed one on the other?
 
For massless particle ok, because the elicity is the chirality projector [tex]\frac{1 \pm \gamma^5}{2}[/tex]... But for a massive neutrino? It's the same?
 
I don't see any [tex]1+\gamma^5[/tex] there, do you? Which leads me back to my original point: do you see anything in the Lagrangian which has a left-handed neutrino on one side of the operator and a right-handed one on the other?
 
Yes... For example [tex]Z_{\mu} \bar{\psi}_{\nu_l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_{\nu_l}[/tex]. You may take [tex]\nu \rightarrow \nu +Z[/tex] with the first neutrino left-handed and the second right-handed.
The amplitude is [tex]{\cal{M}}_{fi} \approx \bar{u}' \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)u \epsilon_{\mu}[/tex]
with [tex]u^t=\sqrt{\epsilon+m}(\omega_+,\frac{\vec{p}\cdot\vec{\sigma}}{\epsilon+m}\omega_+ )[/tex] and [tex]u'^t=\sqrt{\epsilon'+m}(\omega_-,\frac{\vec{p'}\cdot\vec{\sigma}}{\epsilon+m}\omega_- )[/tex] where [tex]\omega_{\pm}[/tex] are the eigenstates of the elicity...