Why is the packing fraction important for transporting watermelons and oranges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aspodkfpo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the importance of packing fraction in the context of transporting watermelons and oranges. The packing fraction (f) is defined as the ratio of the volume of individual objects to the total volume they occupy, with a typical value of 0.64 for randomly arranged spherical chocolates. This inefficiency in packing directly impacts transportation costs, as fewer watermelons can be transported compared to oranges due to their larger size and lower packing efficiency. The calculations presented demonstrate that the speed of chocolates exiting a funnel is influenced by their packing arrangement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of packing fraction and its significance in volume calculations
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts such as velocity and volume
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis for verifying equations
  • Basic comprehension of fluid dynamics as it relates to flow through funnels
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of packing fraction in different materials and its applications
  • Study the principles of fluid dynamics, particularly in relation to flow rates and cross-sectional areas
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of volume occupied by spheres in various packing arrangements
  • Investigate the economic implications of packing efficiency in logistics and transportation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for logistics managers, physicists, and anyone involved in the transportation of goods, particularly those interested in optimizing packing efficiency and reducing transportation costs.

Physics news on Phys.org
The chocolates push each other out of the funnel.
 
BvU said:
The chocolates push each other out of the funnel.
ii) there should be a horizontal speed as well, and why would the chocolate pushed out be at the top and come down , i.e. 2r.

iii) understand this now
 
aspodkfpo said:
ii) there should be a horizontal speed as well, and why would the chocolate pushed out be at the top and come down , i.e. 2r.
Each spherical chocolate within the outlet horizontal tube is pushed by the one inmediately upstream and it pushes the one inmediately downstream.
There is no gap among them.
Because of that, any fixed point of the outlet tube "sees" five spheres to go by in one second.
A row of five spheres has a length of five diameters.

##Speed=Distance~travelled~by~one~sphere/time=(2r)(5)/1=10r/s##

"As the level in the top of the funnel is steady the number of chocolates going in the top must be the same as the number coming out the bottom of the funnel. This means that 5 chocolates per sec- ond will come out of the funnels."
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: aspodkfpo
aspodkfpo said:
For c) iii), why did they add a /f for volume?
I believe that is the packing fraction -- the total of the individual candy volumes divided by the bulk volume they occupy. Note the comment below: "b) some students had difficulty interpreting the meaning of a packing fraction"

One way of reasoning your way to the formula above is to start by asking: How much bulk volume is occupied by five candies?

The answer is: ##5\frac{4 \pi r^3}{3f}##. They would occupy ##5 \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3## but they are inefficiently packed. So they occupy more volume than that.
 
Last edited:
aspodkfpo said:
For c) iii), why did they add a /f for volume?
If you do a dimmensional analysis, you could see that the equation is for velocity rather than volume (Volume occupied by 5 spheres per second / Cross area of funnel).

"The packing fraction (f) is defined to be the ratio of the volume of some objects divided by the total volume of space which they occupy.
When arranged randomly the chocolates have a packing fraction of 0.64."

That is the reason that increases the cost of transporting watermelons respect to transporting oranges: you can pack less units in same truck.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aspodkfpo

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
79
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K