Why is the potential of Earth not always equal to zero?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric potential, specifically questioning why the potential of Earth is often considered to be zero in various problems, despite it not being universally zero. Participants explore the implications of defining reference points for potential in electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relativity of electric potential and the arbitrary nature of choosing a reference point. Questions arise regarding the justification for setting the potential of certain surfaces to zero and the implications of this choice in calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of potential and its reference points. Some guidance has been offered regarding the arbitrary nature of potential definitions, but multiple interpretations and questions remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the relative nature of electric potential and the use of Earth as a common reference point, alongside considerations of convenience in calculations. The discussion includes specific scenarios involving concentric charged spheres and the implications of grounding.

gandharva_23
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
we take the potentisl of the Earth to be equal to zero for solving some problems though the potential of Earth is not equal to zero . why is that ? or when can we do that ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential is relative to an arbitrary datum. You just define the zero potential surface wherever it is convenient for the calculations. So differences in potential are real, but an absolute potential does not exist. Think of it in terms of voltages -- you can define any place as zero volts, and then use your DVM to measure the voltage of other things with respect to that spot. Wherever you put the "-" lead of your DVM is automatically defined as the zero potential spot for that particular measurement.
 
we have 2 concentric spheres of radius a and b carrying charge q each . now the inner sphere is earthed . to calculate the final charge in each surface i kept the potential of the inner shell = 0 and used gauss law . am i doing a wrong thing by putting the p[otential of the inner shell = 0 ? if i m justified in doing that then that potential is zero wrt what ?
 
Zero with respect to zero. It is your reference or datum. Often, we refer to "Earth" as zero volts, but only because we use it as our voltage reference so often. The "Earth" is not at the same potential as the Sun, so we could use the voltage at the surface of the sun as our zero reference, but that wouldn't be very convenient, eh? :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K