Why is the probability of measuring an eigenvalue its coefficient squared?

timn
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is an example from Gasiorowicz's Quantum Physics. "Example 3-1" is a particle in an infinite potential-well, but that should not matter.

qm-gasiorowicz-3-11.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Why is P(-2) (which I suppose is the probability that the eigenvalue -2 is measured) the coefficient squared?

The sum of the squares of the coefficient should be normalised, so it makes sense, but I don't understand why.

To figure out how much an eigenfunction contributes to the probability function -- psi^2 -- I'd square psi as follows:

<br /> \left( \frac{N}{4}\sqrt{2\pi}(u_ {-2}+2u_0+u_2) \right)^2<br /> = \frac{N^2\pi^2}{8}(u_ {-2}^2+2u_0^2+u_2^2+2u_{-2}u_2+4u_{-2}u_0+4u_0u_2)<br />

followed by being completely lost.

Could anyone explain this or make it seem plausible for me?

Edit: For reference, the answer is P(-2)=1/6.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timn said:

Homework Statement



This is an example from Gasiorowicz's Quantum Physics. "Example 3-1" is a particle in an infinite potential-well, but that should not matter.

qm-gasiorowicz-3-11.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Why is P(-2) (which I suppose is the probability that the eigenvalue -2 is measured) the coefficient squared?

The sum of the squares of the coefficient should be normalised, so it makes sense, but I don't understand why.

To figure out how much an eigenfunction contributes to the probability function -- psi^2 -- I'd square psi as follows:

<br /> \left( \frac{N}{4}\sqrt{2\pi}(u_ {-2}+2u_0+u_2) \right)^2<br /> = \frac{N^2\pi^2}{8}(u_ {-2}^2+2u_0^2+u_2^2+2u_{-2}u_2+4u_{-2}u_0+4u_0u_2)<br />

followed by being completely lost.

Could anyone explain this or make it seem plausible for me?

Edit: For reference, the answer is P(-2)=1/6.

You can start this way if you want. Once you take the (absolute) square of psi, then remember that psi is normalized so let:

<br /> \int\left( \frac{N}{4}\sqrt{2\pi}(u_ {-2}+2u_0+u_2) \right)^2 d\phi<br /> = \frac{N^2\pi^2}{8}\int(u_ {-2}^2+2u_0^2+u_2^2+2u_{-2}u_2+4u_{-2}u_0+4u_0u_2)d\phi=1<br />

Use the othogonality of the eigenfunctions to simplify the integral. Notice that terms like u_n^*u_m with m\not= n will integrate to zero. Thus after all the integrations are done, you should be left with:

\frac{2\pi N^2}{16}\int(|u_2|^2+4|u_0|^2+|u_{-2}|^2)d\phi=1

Simplify this by integrating. You will see that the sum of the absolute squares of the coefficients will be equal to one, and thus it also follows from your line of reasoning that the squares of the coefficients are the correct measure of probabilities for different eigenstates.
 
Last edited:
Aha! I had forgotten about the orthogonality. Also, I had an epiphany when I realized that A_n = \int_0^a u_n^*(x) \psi(x) dx is just a projection.

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top