Why is the probability of measuring an eigenvalue its coefficient squared?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The probability of measuring an eigenvalue in quantum mechanics is determined by the square of its coefficient in the wave function, as established in Gasiorowicz's Quantum Physics. Specifically, for the infinite potential well example, the probability P(-2) is calculated as 1/6, demonstrating that the normalization of the wave function ensures the sum of the squares of the coefficients equals one. The orthogonality of eigenfunctions plays a crucial role in simplifying the integral calculations, confirming that the squares of the coefficients accurately represent the probabilities of different eigenstates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in quantum systems
  • Knowledge of normalization conditions for wave functions
  • Basic proficiency in integral calculus and orthogonality concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the orthogonality of eigenfunctions in quantum systems
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of probabilities from wave functions
  • Investigate the implications of eigenvalue measurements in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, wave function analysis, and eigenvalue problems. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of probability calculations in quantum systems.

timn
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is an example from Gasiorowicz's Quantum Physics. "Example 3-1" is a particle in an infinite potential-well, but that should not matter.

qm-gasiorowicz-3-11.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Why is P(-2) (which I suppose is the probability that the eigenvalue -2 is measured) the coefficient squared?

The sum of the squares of the coefficient should be normalised, so it makes sense, but I don't understand why.

To figure out how much an eigenfunction contributes to the probability function -- psi^2 -- I'd square psi as follows:

<br /> \left( \frac{N}{4}\sqrt{2\pi}(u_ {-2}+2u_0+u_2) \right)^2<br /> = \frac{N^2\pi^2}{8}(u_ {-2}^2+2u_0^2+u_2^2+2u_{-2}u_2+4u_{-2}u_0+4u_0u_2)<br />

followed by being completely lost.

Could anyone explain this or make it seem plausible for me?

Edit: For reference, the answer is P(-2)=1/6.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timn said:

Homework Statement



This is an example from Gasiorowicz's Quantum Physics. "Example 3-1" is a particle in an infinite potential-well, but that should not matter.

qm-gasiorowicz-3-11.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Why is P(-2) (which I suppose is the probability that the eigenvalue -2 is measured) the coefficient squared?

The sum of the squares of the coefficient should be normalised, so it makes sense, but I don't understand why.

To figure out how much an eigenfunction contributes to the probability function -- psi^2 -- I'd square psi as follows:

<br /> \left( \frac{N}{4}\sqrt{2\pi}(u_ {-2}+2u_0+u_2) \right)^2<br /> = \frac{N^2\pi^2}{8}(u_ {-2}^2+2u_0^2+u_2^2+2u_{-2}u_2+4u_{-2}u_0+4u_0u_2)<br />

followed by being completely lost.

Could anyone explain this or make it seem plausible for me?

Edit: For reference, the answer is P(-2)=1/6.

You can start this way if you want. Once you take the (absolute) square of psi, then remember that psi is normalized so let:

<br /> \int\left( \frac{N}{4}\sqrt{2\pi}(u_ {-2}+2u_0+u_2) \right)^2 d\phi<br /> = \frac{N^2\pi^2}{8}\int(u_ {-2}^2+2u_0^2+u_2^2+2u_{-2}u_2+4u_{-2}u_0+4u_0u_2)d\phi=1<br />

Use the othogonality of the eigenfunctions to simplify the integral. Notice that terms like u_n^*u_m with m\not= n will integrate to zero. Thus after all the integrations are done, you should be left with:

\frac{2\pi N^2}{16}\int(|u_2|^2+4|u_0|^2+|u_{-2}|^2)d\phi=1

Simplify this by integrating. You will see that the sum of the absolute squares of the coefficients will be equal to one, and thus it also follows from your line of reasoning that the squares of the coefficients are the correct measure of probabilities for different eigenstates.
 
Last edited:
Aha! I had forgotten about the orthogonality. Also, I had an epiphany when I realized that A_n = \int_0^a u_n^*(x) \psi(x) dx is just a projection.

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K