Why is the right-hand rule used for both current and angular momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuby
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The right-hand rule is applied to both electric current in wires and angular momentum in gyroscopes due to the vector nature of these phenomena, where the direction of the vectors is perpendicular to the plane of rotation. This convention simplifies understanding and communication in physics, as it provides a consistent method for determining directionality. The discussion highlights that while the right-hand rule is standard, there are nuances, such as the distinction between the axis of rotation and the plane of motion. The concept of "handedness" is emphasized as a convention rather than a fundamental property. Overall, the right-hand rule serves as a crucial tool in physics for visualizing rotational dynamics and magnetic fields.
nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
Why does the right-hand rule apply to both current in a wire and angular momentum in a gyroscope? Is there there a common denominator between the two effects?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both rotation and the curl of magnetic fields are expressed using vectors which are perpendicular to the plane in which the rotation occurs. In any such situation, it is possible to define the perpendicular vector in two distinct ways. Thankfully, physicists long ago decided to use a single convention for all such decisions.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
perpendicular to the plane in which the rotation occurs.

I think it is more accurate to say "perpendicular to the axis/vector about which the rotation occurs".

I'd agree that right-hand coordinate systems are the norm, but circular/elliptical polarization is still a two-handed convention within a one-handed system.

Regarding the gyroscope, if you use the "curl" of the fingers on your right hand to indicate positive rotation about the vector your thumb points in, you need only point your thumb in the opposite direction (or swap hands) to change the sign of the angular velocity of the gyroscope with respect to "the thumb". Handedness is only a convention - I wouldn't try to read more into it than that.

Regards,

Bill
 

Thread 'Reference frames, center of rotation, etc'

Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?
View full post »

Similar threads

Undergrad Why is the Cross Product Used in Mathematics? Understanding its Role and History
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Undergrad Angular momentum and turning a bicycle
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Undergrad [Q] Lorentz force in momentum conservation view
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Undergrad Why isn't the Lagrangian invariant under ##\theta## rotations?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why does Larmor precession appear to go against the right hand rule?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Graduate Electric and magnetic field lines in a plane wave of finite extent
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
“Why does gyroscope levitate?” stumps 3 physics profs
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
13K
A question about the right hand rule
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad Does the classical theory of angular momentum explain this video of a unicycle robot?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School Found a circuit where current is zero across an ohmic device (dV>0)
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K