MHB Why is there a probability paradox in this bag of balls?

soroban
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

A bag contains two balls.
Either ball can be black or white.

Without drawing any balls, determine the colors of the balls.Solution

The bag could contain any of three contents, each with probabiity \tfrac{1}{3}.

. . \boxed{B B} \qquad \boxed{BW} \qquad \boxed{WW}

Add a black ball to the bag.
The resulting contents are

. . \boxed{BB \,B} \qquad \boxed{BW\,B} \qquad \boxed {WW\,B}Consider the probability of drawing a black ball.

Then: .P(B) \;=\;(\tfrac{1}{3})(\tfrac{3}{3}) + (\tfrac{1}{3})(\tfrac{2}{3}) + (\tfrac{1}{3})(\tfrac{1}{3}) \;=\;\tfrac{6}{9} \;=\;\tfrac{2}{3}Since the probability of drawing a black ball is \tfrac{2}{3}.
. . there must be 2 black and 1 white ball in the bag.

Therefore, before the black ball was added,
. . the bag must have contained one black and one white ball.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My head hurts. (Crying)

-Dan
 
The trick is in your first statement,
soroban said:
The bag could contain any of three contents, each with probabiity \tfrac{1}{3}.
.

There are four equally likely outcomes, WW, WB, BW, and BB. Each has probability 1/4.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The trick is in your first statement,
.

There are four equally likely outcomes, WW, WB, BW, and BB. Each has probability 1/4.
his makes no difference.
We still add one black ball.

\text{We have: }\;WW\!B,\;W\!BB,\;BW\!B,\;BBB

\text{Then we have:}
. . \begin{array}{cccccc}<br /> P(B|WW\!B) &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{4}\cdot \frac{1}{3} &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{12} \\<br /> P(B|W\!BB) &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{2}{3} &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{6} \\<br /> P(B|BW\!B) &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{2}{3} &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{6} \\<br /> P(B|BBB) &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{3}{3} &amp;=&amp; \frac{1}{4} \end{array}

\text{Therefore: }\;P(B) \;=\;\tfrac{1}{12} + \tfrac{1}{6}+\tfrac{1}{6} + \tfrac{1}{4} \;=\;\frac{2}{3}

THe "proof" still holds . . . LOL!
 
Nice conundrum! :)

I believe we've found the expectation, or average if you will, of the number of white and black balls.
 

Hello, ILS!

You've discovered the truth behind this apparent paradox.
This is indeed a matter of expectation, not actual content.

Consider the original bag with two balls
The bag could contain any of three contents, each with probability \tfrac{1}{3}.
. . \boxed{BB}\quad \boxed{BW} \quad \boxed{WW}

Consider the probability of drawing a black ball.,

P(B) \;=\;\left(\tfrac{1}{3}\right)\left(\tfrac{2}{2}\right) + \left(\tfrac{1}{3}\right)\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) + \left(\tfrac{1}{3}\right)\left(\tfrac{0}{2}\right) \;=\; \frac{1}{2}

We would NOT conclude that the bag must contain one black and one white ball.
But that is exactly what we did with the bag with three balls.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top