Why is this equation dimensionally correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Copse
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dimensional correctness of the equation y = (2m)cos(kx), where k = 2m^-1. Participants are exploring the implications of dimensional analysis in the context of trigonometric functions and their arguments.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether trigonometric functions are dimensionless and what that means for the argument kx. There is also an exploration of the dimensions of the variables involved, particularly whether x is a distance.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the nature of trigonometric functions and their requirement for dimensionless arguments. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these clarifications on the original equation.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the dimensions of x and the assumptions being made about the variables involved. The original poster notes a lack of information in their textbook regarding trigonometric functions in the context of dimensional analysis.

Copse
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that this equation is dimensionally correct.
y = (2m)cos(kx), where k = 2m^-1


Homework Equations


None that I know of.


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know why this is correct. I have looked through the chapter and all of the dimensional analysis examples(there are only three) list what the variables represent. The only information given is what I have typed, so I am just assuming that m represents meters.

Are trig. functions dimensionless?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, trigonometric functions take arguments that are dimensionless.
 
Pengwuino said:
Yes, trigonometric functions take arguments that are dimensionless.

Thank you for answering my question.

So, does it just boil down to the equation being correct because y and 2m are both lengths?
 
Were you asking if kx is dimensionless or if cos kx is dimensionless?
 
vela said:
Were you asking if kx is dimensionless or if cos kx is dimensionless?

cos(kx)
This is my first physics class and our book doesn't mention trig. functions in the section about dimensional analysis. I am just a little confused.
 
OK, Pengwuino answered the other question: kx needs to be dimensionless. The value of the cosine is dimensionless as well, which is the answer to your question.

In general, the standard mathematical functions map a unitless quantity to a unitless result. The main exception is the logarithm because you can do things like log (a/b) = log a - log b, but you should be able to combine logarithms in a way so that you have a unitless argument.
 
Actually, whether this is "dimensionally correct" depends upon what dimensions x has!

Assuming that x is a distance, measured in meters, then, since k has dimensions of "m^{-1}", kx is dimensionless. In general, mathematical functions take dimensionless variables and return dimensionless values. When you are told that f(x)= x^2 and asked "what is f(3)", you don't have to ask if it is 3 meters or 3 feet, the answer is "9"!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K