Why is this true? General relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the scalar product in the context of general relativity and its application to manifolds. Participants emphasize that while scalar products can be understood in Euclidean space, their generalization requires a proper understanding of (pseudo-)Riemannian manifolds, which possess a metric. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between general manifolds and those equipped with a metric, as not all manifolds inherently possess one. This distinction is crucial for accurately applying concepts from general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scalar products in Euclidean space
  • Familiarity with the concept of manifolds
  • Knowledge of (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry
  • Basic grasp of tensor notation and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of (pseudo-)Riemannian manifolds
  • Learn about the metric tensor and its role in general relativity
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of scalar products in curved spaces
  • Investigate the implications of curvature on scalar products and geometry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students studying general relativity, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of manifolds and their metrics.

Replusz
Messages
141
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
I dont understand why this is true generally. I can see it in Euclidean space, but this is for a general manifold.
Relevant Equations
-
"their scalar product is..." why?

1570003851818.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you think it is not true for a general manifold?
 
Chestermiller said:
Why would you think it is not true for a general manifold?
At the moment I don't think anything, and its Maths, not what people think. This is a lecture notes so I assume its correct. But I don't see where it comes from, I.e. Why its true
Even for euclidean space i see it intuitively not mathematically
 
Replusz said:
Homework Statement: I don't understand why this is true generally. I can see it in Euclidean space, but this is for a general manifold.

Write ##\mathbf{u}## and ##\mathbf{v}## in terms of the basis vectors ##\left\{ \partial / \partial x^\mu \right\} ##, and substitute these expressions into ##g \left( \mathbf{u} , \mathbf{v} \right)##.
 
A little nitpicking about terminology. There is no "general manifold" statement really accurate.
The sensible way to make the scalar product of ##\mathbb{R}^n## "more general" is to consider manifolds with metric, aka (pseudo-)Riemann-ian manifolds. A general manifold needn't have a metric.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K