Why is this true? General relativity

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 1K views
Replusz
Messages
141
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
I dont understand why this is true generally. I can see it in Euclidean space, but this is for a general manifold.
Relevant Equations
-
"their scalar product is..." why?

1570003851818.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chestermiller said:
Why would you think it is not true for a general manifold?
At the moment I don't think anything, and its Maths, not what people think. This is a lecture notes so I assume its correct. But I don't see where it comes from, I.e. Why its true
Even for euclidean space i see it intuitively not mathematically
 
Replusz said:
Homework Statement: I don't understand why this is true generally. I can see it in Euclidean space, but this is for a general manifold.

Write ##\mathbf{u}## and ##\mathbf{v}## in terms of the basis vectors ##\left\{ \partial / \partial x^\mu \right\} ##, and substitute these expressions into ##g \left( \mathbf{u} , \mathbf{v} \right)##.
 
A little nitpicking about terminology. There is no "general manifold" statement really accurate.
The sensible way to make the scalar product of ##\mathbb{R}^n## "more general" is to consider manifolds with metric, aka (pseudo-)Riemann-ian manifolds. A general manifold needn't have a metric.