Why isn't it possible that gravity is repulsive at long distances?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronothread
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether gravity could be repulsive at long distances, particularly in the context of the universe's accelerating expansion and dark energy. Participants explore theoretical implications and the limitations of current gravitational models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the prevailing understanding of gravity, asking why it cannot be the cause of the universe's expansion and why the equations of gravity are considered reliable.
  • Another participant suggests that according to Einstein's theory of gravity, there is no scenario in which gravity could be negative within our universe.
  • There is speculation about the possibility of gravitational curvature resembling a saddle surface, though this remains an imaginative idea rather than a formal theory.
  • One participant asserts that the idea of repulsive gravity is being seriously considered and has not been ruled out, emphasizing the need for more data to understand the accelerating expansion of the universe.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about explaining the acceleration of expansion within the framework of "orthodox" General Relativity (GR).
  • There is a meta-discussion about the nature of scientific inquiry and the limitations of existing frameworks, with a participant acknowledging their own informal tone and apologizing for any offense caused.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the idea that gravity could be repulsive while others maintain that current theories do not allow for this. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the surprising nature of the discovery regarding the universe's accelerating expansion and the limitations of current gravitational theories, but do not provide specific mathematical or theoretical frameworks to support their claims.

Chronothread
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm still only an undergraduate studying physics, so there's still much I don't know. Hence why it's probably likely that I can't figure out the answer to this question myself. Anyway, I've looked into the subject of dark energy a little bit and from what I've seen we still know very little about it. From what we've observed it seems the general thought is that the universe is accelerating in it's expansion. So my question is: How do we know that gravity is not the cause of the expansion? From all the places I've read about people suggesting this idea, I've seen them told that research has shown that gravity can't be the cause. Yet, I've not seen an explanation of why this is the case. I was just hoping someone could give me an explanation of why we know, with very little doubt, that we don't have the equation for gravity wrong. Why it can't be that distances within a galaxy are too small that the "other part" of the equation of gravity is so small it is neglected, but when it comes to intergalactic distances it causes a repulsive force. Like I said before, I am not trying to present this as a theory, but just trying to get a specific explanation of why it is not possible, because I have not yet found one.

Thank you for your time.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi, dude;
I don't really know much about this stuff, but if you go by the Einsteinian theory of gravity being space-time warpature, then there really isn't any circumstance within our Universe in which it could be negative.
 
It's quite fun to imagine that we are also the nanoscale of well, something. Could anything actually create gravitational curvature like that? Maybe as in a saddle surface?
 
dst said:
Could anything actually create gravitational curvature like that? Maybe as in a saddle surface?

I guess now that 'Broke Back Mountain' is a classic, anything is possible in a saddle...
 
It is definitely possible. It is at least being seriously considered and I don't think it has been ruled out by anyone, but ultimately we need more data before we can say for sure.
As far as I know we don't have a good explanation for why the expansion is accelerating (it was a VERY surprising discovery), and I don't think it can be explained within the framework of "orthodox" GR.
 
f95toli said:
and I don't think it can be explained within the framework of "orthodox" GR.

Welcome to your education. Nothing can be fully explained within any frameworks that we're intimately familiar with. Let's get on to the scientific approach to things.

edit: I just realized that I probably came over as sounding like at total ******* on that last post, and that's not what I wanted. Sorry, F95toli. And my further apologies to anyone that I offended with my posts. I'm pretty drunk, so my coherency is in doubt.
 
Last edited:
Danger said:
I guess now that 'Broke Back Mountain' is a classic, anything is possible in a saddle...

:smile:

i dunno, Danger, why they ever stripped you of your Funniest PFer award. you deserve that forever.
 
I didn't get 'stripped of it'; someone came along who deserved it more. It was an honour while I had it, but those days are behind me. I don't care who has the ribbon, as long as people keep making me smile. I can't see that PF will ever disappoint me on that level, or for educating me. Dammit, you're my family... oh, go **** off before I start crying...
 
you said "****"! oh, my virgin ears!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K