Undergrad Why isn't path integral of H-field 0?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the path integral of the magnetic field H around an infinite plane of current. It clarifies that while the magnetic field above the plane circulates clockwise and counterclockwise below, the integral does not equal zero because the loop encloses a non-zero current. The application of Ampere's law reveals that the integral results in a value dependent on the surface current density K. The confusion arose from incorrectly summing the magnitudes of H without considering their directions. Ultimately, the correct interpretation shows that the path integral reflects the presence of enclosed current, leading to a non-zero result.
yosimba2000
Messages
206
Reaction score
9
So for an infinite plane of current, current traveling in the X direction, the magnetic field everywhere above the plane is going clockwise, and the m. field below the plane is going counterclockwise.

So the path integral is Integral of H dot dl = Current Enclosed

Why, in this video, does the path integral NOT equal 0?



Isnt the top path going from Y = -L to L, and the bottom path going from Y = -L to L?

So you get ∫H ⋅ dl = ∫Hydirection⋅ ⋅ dyydirection + ∫Hnegativeydirection⋅ ⋅ dynegativeydirection

Then you get Hy, y from -L to L, plus Hy, y from L to -L?

So you get H(L - -L) + H(-L - L), and you get 2HL-2HL = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yosimba2000 said:
So for an infinite plane of current, current traveling in the X direction, the magnetic field everywhere above the plane is going clockwise, and the m. field below the plane is going counterclockwise.
No, the magnetic field is parallel to the sheet of current both above and below the plane.
yosimba2000 said:
Why, in this video, does the path integral NOT equal 0?
Because the loop encloses a non-zero current.
yosimba2000 said:
Isnt the top path going from Y = -L to L, and the bottom path going from Y = -L to L?
Ampere's laws states that
$$\oint\mathbf{H}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=I_{enclosed}$$
Using ##K## to represent the surface current density, this becomes
$$H_{x}L+(-H_{x})(-L)=2H_{x}L=KL$$
So the magnitude of the field is
$$H_{x}=\frac{K}{2}$$
 
I think I see it. I was trying to add the magnitudes without account for the directions.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
904