Why light speed is constant? (please read)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of why the speed of light is constant in a vacuum, exploring implications for special relativity and the nature of light itself. Participants delve into philosophical considerations, theoretical implications, and speculative hypotheses regarding the origins of this constancy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the constancy of light speed is foundational to special relativity, leading to time dilation and Lorentz contraction.
  • One participant suggests that the question of 'why' is more philosophical than scientific.
  • Another participant argues that the constant speed of light remains significant even in hypothetical scenarios where no particles travel at that speed, as long as the laws of physics maintain Lorentz symmetry.
  • A hypothesis is presented linking the speed of light to events during the Big Bang, proposing that photons were emitted at a constant speed due to their massless nature and lack of gravitational interaction.
  • One participant challenges the appropriateness of using cosmological arguments to explain a local phenomenon like the speed of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the question regarding the constancy of light speed, with some leaning towards philosophical interpretations while others focus on theoretical implications. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments rely on assumptions about the nature of light and the implications of special relativity, while the relationship between cosmological events and local phenomena is debated without consensus.

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
We'll know that the base of special relativity theory is "the light has a constant speed in vacuum".

Time dilation and Lorentz contraction are consequences of the constance of light speed.

If we excite photons, for example, its frequence increases (and the wavelength could decrease), but it happens for light speed continues constant. It's also an consequence of constance of light speed.

Everything seems to be a consequence of constance of light speed.

But, the question is: WHY light has a constant speed (in vacuum)?
What about tachyons? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon" )

Any discussions are welcome.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The question of 'Why?' is more philosophy than physics.
 
Anyway, the constant c would still be of great importance (and would still be measurable) even if there were no particles that moved that fast, assuming the laws of physics were still Lorentz-symmetric. For example, clocks moving at some v slower than light would still slow down by the factor of [tex]\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}[/tex].
 
im not sure, but this is what i think:
Hypothesis of why the speed of light is the speed of light:
In the time of Big Bang when the first atoms were created, the matter and anti-matter destroyed each other and made the photons. When they eliminated each other, photons were sent out, in the exact speed it was accelerated in. And as Newton’s laws says: “Nothing can be stoppep without friction”. And, as we all know, photons are massless particles and have no effect on gravity, and that’s why they never stop and always go in the same speed. :D PEACE!
 
Trying to invoke cosmological arguments to explain a local phenomena doesn't seem a bit bizarre to you..?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
9K