Why Mesons Can't Be Made of 2 Quarks Alone

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A meson is definitively composed of a quark-antiquark pair, and cannot consist solely of two quarks due to the requirement for color neutrality in hadrons. This principle dictates that configurations such as up-up or down-down quarks are forbidden by the Pauli exclusion principle. The discussion confirms that while exotic combinations like tetraquarks and pentaquarks exist theoretically, they do not apply to the formation of standard mesons. The transition from glasma to quark-gluon plasma does not permit the existence of a "crippled meson" made of only two quarks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quark composition in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the Pauli exclusion principle
  • Knowledge of color charge and color neutrality in hadrons
  • Basic concepts of quark-gluon plasma and glasma
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of quark-antiquark pairs in mesons
  • Study the implications of color charge in hadron formation
  • Explore the characteristics of exotic hadrons like tetraquarks and pentaquarks
  • Investigate the transition processes between glasma and quark-gluon plasma
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, students of particle physics, and researchers interested in the fundamental properties of hadrons and quark interactions.

Achim
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
As far as I know a Baryon is made of three Quarks (eg uud, udd etc) and a Meson of two Quarks, a Quark/Antiquark pair. As I am not a student / scholar in Physics but very deeply interested in this field, I couldn't find any explanation, why a Meson is omly made up by a Quark/Antiquark pair. What hinders a Meson to be made of, let's say an up-down Quark pair? Pauli only forbids constructions like up-up or down-down as both involved Quarks cannot be differed in this. So, can anyone please help my fault in thinking and grant me a hint, on why two Quarks cannot form a Meson WITHOUT an Anti-Quark / third Quark?
Add-on question: if such ud-Quark is not possible, would such construction MAYBE possible in a process when glasma becomes Quark-Gluon-Plasma?
This is not a question for a scientific work, neither homework etc. this is just a question to ease my always chatting mind at night as I am very sich, struck with central apnea sleeping disorder and hence my mind ventures into all sorts of science to keep my spirit going. I apologise for any error I made in constructing my question. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drakkith said:
I think hadrons (baryons and mesons) are required to be color neutral, something which can only happen if you have 3 quarks or a quark-antiquark pair.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/color.html
Thank you, I understand the status-quo. My question's intention is different, I am after "is a crippled meson possible or not" plus "if it is possible, what condition could produce it". That why I mentioned the glasma -> quark-gluon-plasma transition.

Thoughts?
 
Achim said:
, I am after "is a crippled meson possible or not"

And the answer is "no", for the reasons explained above.
 
Drakkith said:
I think hadrons (baryons and mesons) are required to be color neutral, something which can only happen if you have 3 quarks or a quark-antiquark pair.
Or with 4 quarks and one antiquark ("pentaquark"), with two quarks or two antiquarks ("tetraquark"), with no valence quarks at all ("glueball") or with even more exotic combinations, but those things have not been observed yet (at least not conclusively).
Achim said:
I am after "is a crippled meson possible or not"
No.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K