Why no smear in Stern-Gerlach experiment?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of silver atoms in the Stern-Gerlach experiment, particularly why they do not exhibit a smear of states and how the spin analyzer influences their behavior. Participants explore concepts related to quantum superposition, measurement, and the role of the non-uniform magnetic field in determining the spin states of atoms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why silver atoms do not exist in a superposition of spin states, contrasting them with thermal photons.
  • Others propose that the spin analyzer, represented by the non-uniform magnetic field, forces the atoms into eigenstates of Jz.
  • There is a challenge regarding the nature of the spin analyzer and how it selects eigenstates, with some arguing that atoms with zero net spin due to superposition would not be deflected.
  • One participant clarifies that an equal superposition of spin states does not imply zero net spin, emphasizing that measurement collapses the wave function into a definite state.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that the Stern-Gerlach apparatus creates entangled states of Jz with position rather than pure states, and that blocking certain paths can yield a nearly pure eigenstate.
  • One participant expresses a partial understanding of the apparatus, noting its ability to detect only spin-up and spin-down states and how it decomposes other spin states into these components.
  • There is a comparison made between the behavior of photons in polarizers and atoms in the Stern-Gerlach apparatus, with some arguing that both systems exhibit binary outcomes.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of using birefringent crystals as an analogy for the Stern-Gerlach apparatus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of superposition, measurement, and the role of the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the interpretations of these phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the implications of superposition and measurement, as well as the dependence on definitions of spin states and the specific workings of the Stern-Gerlach apparatus.

Alfred Cann
Messages
82
Reaction score
4
Why do the silver atoms not exist in a superposition of states with every possible mixture of spin-up and spin-down? Thermal photons do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because they are sent through a spin analyzer which forces them into eignestates of Jz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
What is the spin analyzer, the non-uniform magnetic field? How does that force a selection into eigenstates? If an atom has, for example, zero net spin because of superposition, wouldn't it go straight?
 
Alfred Cann said:
What is the spin analyzer, the non-uniform magnetic field? How does that force a selection into eigenstates? If an atom has, for example, zero net spin because of superposition, wouldn't it go straight?

The equal superposition of spin-up and spin-down is not a state of zero net spin (in fact the spin has no value at all until we perform a measurement - it's like asking whether a tossed coin is heads-up or tails-up before you've tossed it). Instead, it is a state in which an interaction that depends on the spin has a 50% chance of coming out as if the spin is up and a 50% chance of coming out as if the spin is down. We call these interactions "measurements" or "observations" Of the spin because when we look at the result we know what the spin is now that the interaction has happened. The interaction with the non-uniform magnetic field is such an interaction.

In the original formulation of quantum mechanics (the "Copenhagen interpretation") we would say that the wave function was a superposition of spin-up and spin-down until it encountered the non-uniform magnetic field; and the interaction with the magnetic field caused the wave function to "collapse" into one of the two non-superimposed possibilities.

One of the postulates of quantum mechanics is that the result of a measurement must be one of the eigenvalues of the observable we're measuring (spin-up and spin-down in this case), and that immediately after the measurement the system will be in the corresponding eigenstate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
The Stern-Gerlach apparatus does not make pure states of determined ##J_z## out of a beam of thermal (i.e., unpolarized) particles but it creates a state where ##J_z## is entangled with position. With an ideal Stern-Gerlach apparatus you can then make a beam of a (nearly) pure eigenstate with determined ##J_z## by blocking out all other partial beams with a different ##J_z##. No collapse esoterics is needed just some material blocking the particles, you don't want to consider further ;-)).
 
I think I've got a partial understanding. The SG apparatus can only detect spin-up and spin-down. It is blind to all other states. If an atom comes in with, say, spin right, the apparatus will decompose that into its spin-up and -down components, each with probability amplitude of 0.707, and display those. This is quite counter-intuitive.
The photon case is easier to understand; a photon either gets thru a polarizer or not; you can't get 60% of a photon. If a photon goes thru a vertical polarizer, all we know is that it wasn't horizontally polarized. Its polarization could have been linear at any other angle, or elliptical of either handedness with any degree of ellipticity at any angle, which meant it had a vertical component, which, in turn meant it had some probability of going thru the polarizer. Oh, and after the polarizer we know it's vertically polarized.
 
Alfred Cann said:
The photon case is easier to understand; a photon either gets thru a polarizer or not
How so? The difference between the two cases is that either the photon goes through or it doesn't. We could produce the same effect with the S-G machine just by blocking one or the other paths out so that we can describe the situation as "either the atom gets through or not". You can't get 60% of a photon, but you also (even more forcefully) can't get 60% of an atom.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K