Why only two kinds of vector products defined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunny Singh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on why only the dot and cross products are commonly defined for vector multiplication in physics, particularly in applications like work and torque. These two products are deemed sufficient because they effectively address the needs of most physical problems encountered in classical mechanics and engineering. While other vector products exist, they are rarely utilized in standard physics education, as they apply to more specialized scenarios. The dot and cross products provide essential tools for problem-solving, making them the focus of teaching. Overall, the limited use of alternative vector products stems from their lack of necessity in typical physical situations.
Sunny Singh
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Why only the dot and cross product for vector multiplication is defined and not another kind of vector product like one in which the magnitude is that of the dot product and direction is of the cross product. I mean if A and B be two vectors then let there be a vector product such that A#B=ABcos@i where @ is the angle between A and B and i is the direction perpendicular to both of them described by right hand screw rule. Why don't we encounter any situation in Physics where such a vector product is required?? Why is the dot and cross product sufficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sunny Singh said:
Why only the dot and cross product for vector multiplication is defined and not another kind of vector product...
You have just defined another kind of vector product. So your question is now obsolete.
 
A.T. said:
You have just defined another kind of vector product. So your question is now obsolete.
sorry my question was incomplete at that time. i want to ask why only dot and cross product is required in physics like when calculating work done and Torque? why any other type of vector product is not required for any physical situation and hence not defined?
 
Sunny Singh said:
sorry my question was incomplete at that time. i want to ask why only dot and cross product is required in physics like when calculating work done and Torque? why any other type of vector product is not required for any physical situation and hence not defined?

Those two are the ones that have been found to be most useful (in the sense of being good tools for solving problems) in all the physics that you'll be studying before you to get to quantum mechanics. They're also needed for much of engineering and mechanical design. Thus, they're the ones that get taught first and most widely.

As other posters in this thread have pointed out, there are other possible vector products as well - most people just never never encounter them because they never study the sorts of problems in which they would be useful.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
25K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K