Why plant become dominately sporophyte rather than gametophyte

  • Thread starter Thread starter himura137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on why plants evolved to predominantly feature a sporophyte generation rather than a gametophyte generation. Key points include the limited vascular tissue in gametophyte-dominant species, which restricts their ability to grow tall. While some argue that gametophytes could have evolved tree-like structures, there is no fossil evidence to support this. Ultimately, the role of natural selection is emphasized as a stochastic process, introducing randomness that complicates the reconstruction of evolutionary pathways over 450 million years.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plant life cycles, specifically sporophyte and gametophyte generations
  • Knowledge of vascular tissue functions in plant growth
  • Familiarity with evolutionary biology concepts, particularly natural selection
  • Basic comprehension of paleobotany and fossil evidence
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between sporophyte and gametophyte dominance in various plant groups
  • Study the role of vascular tissue in plant evolution and growth habits
  • Explore case studies of natural selection in plant species
  • Investigate fossil records related to early plant evolution and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Students of botany, evolutionary biologists, and anyone interested in understanding plant evolution and the significance of sporophyte dominance in the plant kingdom.

himura137
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
why plant become dominately sporophyte rather than gametophyte? i am currently learning about mosses, fern, gymnosperm and angiosperms and i got stuck when trying to make a connection between them.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
This has been sitting unaswered for a while. The real reason is that there is no good answer.

Some folks might say that it's because gameotphyte-dominant species do not have a lot of vascular tissue that will support tall growht habits... So they could not easily grow tall... but they do have some vascular tissue. So in theory at least, one of them could have evolved the ability to be more tree-like. I don't know of any fossil evidence that this happened.

The bottom line:

Basically Natural Selection is a stochastic process. It has a lot of randomness, that cannot be reconstructed 450 million years later.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
771
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
142K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K