Why read bottom/top of menicsus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantum123
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the established rule for reading the top or bottom of the meniscus in volumetric measurements. It emphasizes the importance of reading at the flat part of the meniscus to ensure accurate volume measurements, as distortions caused by surface tension can affect readings. The conversation also touches on the calibration of volumetric flasks and the critical nature of precision in measurements, particularly with different liquids like water and mercury. The accuracy of these measurements can be further enhanced through weighing and density assessments rather than relying solely on volumetric glassware. Overall, understanding the meniscus and its effects is crucial for achieving precise fluid volume measurements.
quantum123
Messages
306
Reaction score
1
Who established the rule that we must read the top/bottom of the meniscus?
How is the rule's accuracies justified in both the top and bottom cases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent question! That's how accurate volumetric flasks are calibrated- in other words, where the marks go. Does that help?

I don't think I could use standard volumetric glassware to accurately meter out Hg, but I've never needed to work with volumes of the stuff.
 
The meniscus is caused by surface tension effects at the point where the meniscus meets the glass (usually it's glass)

So you get a small distortion there and the level of the liquid is higher or lower than the rest of the surface. (depends on the liquid involved)

Basically the rule is just saying read it where the meniscus is flat so you get a good measure of the actual level - don't read it at the distortion.
 
But how can both the bottom rule and top rule apply for the same flask?
 
quantum123 said:
But how can both the bottom rule and top rule apply for the same flask?

If I understand your question, it's an issue of accuracy. To see this, calculate how much fluid is in the meniscus for water on glass (and Hg on glass), and compare that to the overall volume.

For highly precise measurements, the issue becomes more critical. The glassware you are thinking of is not used for metrologic type measurements.

http://ts.nist.gov/MeasurementServices/Calibrations/upload/SP250_72.pdf

I'm not sure if in the end, the most precise measurements of fluid volume are actually performed by weighing and density measurements using things like:

http://www.nist.gov/cstl/process/fluid/upload/250_78.pdf

Page 11/12 has information you may find interesting. A Hg-specific paper is here:

http://iopscience.iop.org/0026-1394/41/2/S02/pdf/0026-1394_41_2_S02.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
15K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K