Why reducing nature of hydrides increases down a group?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raghav Gupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Nature
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the contrasting behaviors of oxides and hydrides as one moves down a group in the periodic table. It highlights that the reducing nature of oxides decreases down a group, while for hydrides, it increases due to decreasing bond dissociation energy. Participants explore the reasons behind these trends, noting that increasing electropositivity of metals affects the charge on hydrides, making them more reducing. The conversation also touches on the acidic nature of non-metallic oxides versus the basic nature of metallic oxides, with references to specific compounds like CO and NaO. There is confusion regarding the stability and reactivity of oxides in group 17 and the role of the inert pair effect in stabilizing oxide ions. Additionally, the relationship between basicity and reducing strength is debated, particularly regarding hydrides and their classification. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity of these chemical behaviors and the need for a deeper understanding of periodic trends.
  • #31
After reading it, you possibly won't come back to the thread.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #32
AdityaDev said:
After reading it, you possibly won't come back to the thread.
Alas. I don't have that.
Can you tell only why metallic oxides are basic in nature.
 
  • #33
You can get the ebooks online at cheap rates.
metallic oxides are basic in nature because they react with water to form metal hydroxides which are basic in nature.
 
  • #34
AdityaDev said:
metallic oxides are basic in nature because they react with water to form metal hydroxides which are basic in nature.
So why metallic hydrides are not basic?
 
  • #35
I have never read about basic nature of hydrides. They are known to be reducing agents. Alkali metal hydrides react with water liberating hydrogen gas and a hydroxide. Also such hudrides are called salt-like hydrides not acidic or basic hydrides. But non metal hydrides are basic like NH3.
 
  • #36
AdityaDev said:
I have never read about basic nature of hydrides. They are known to be reducing agents. Alkali metal hydrides react with water liberating hydrogen gas and a hydroxide. Also such hudrides are called salt-like hydrides not acidic or basic hydrides. But non metal hydrides are basic like NH3.
But when comparing acidity of NH3,PH3,AsH3,SbH3 we say that Down the group acidity increases which is analogue to up the group basicity increases?
 
  • #37
That is because of low electron density at central atom. As size increases, the electron density around central metal atom decreases hence basicity decreases.
 
  • #38
AdityaDev said:
That is because of low electron density at central atom. As size increases, the electron density around central metal atom decreases hence basicity decreases.
So why that statement is wrong in case of oxides of that group?
 
  • #39
Jack2 said:
I would strongly advise you to read this up . It will give you an idea for your halogen statement .
In continuation with post #25 why then group 16? Wiki is showing that they are not hydrides but like hydrogen selenide, hydrogen oxide etc.
 
  • #40
Raghav Gupta said:
In continuation with post #25 why then group 16? Wiki is showing that they are not hydrides but like hydrogen selenide, hydrogen oxide etc.
Hydride mean a hydrogen atom with a negative charge .
In all halogens , hydrogen has +1 charge . They are called acids , not hydrides .
In group 16 , the lower elements are metallic ( having EN less than 2.1 ) so their compounds can be called hydrides . So I made a generalized statement .
But surely halogen groups don't form hydrides .
 
  • #41
Why the generalized statement , when only in that group Polonium is a metal? It should be called a exception from 16 group.
and what about this?
Raghav Gupta said:
I was reading that but there the wikipedian has written citation needed where he/she is saying following compounds are hydrogen and not hydrides, means he/she can be lying. :biggrin:

Basically what I meant in this thread is hydrogen bonding to elements whether it would be a hydride or hydrogen that's all nomenclature but a hydrogen is hydrogen.
Now one can also argue with oxides, there are peroxides, superoxides. But what really matter is linkage of element with oxygen.
 
  • #42
To all - please keep your posts on topic and if you have new questions, start a new thread.
 
  • #43
Borek said:
To all - please keep your posts on topic and if you have new questions, start a new thread.

I few days ago started a new thread but got only one reply and none then.
Even if you have said I don't know it would have been fine( I know elders hesitate to say this sometimes but then also basic etiquettes are required).

Anyway I agree with you that for new questions new thread must be started and by the way excluding 2 threads you have helped me a lot in chemistry.
But any comment or reply for first para?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K