Why should I use conservation of energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the conservation of energy principle to solve a physics problem involving two masses (m1 = 23.00 kg and m2 = 13.60 kg) and a uniform pulley (M = 5.00 kg). The initial attempt to solve the problem using free body diagrams resulted in incorrect calculations, specifically in determining acceleration and time of descent. The correct approach, as highlighted by forum participants, involves using the conservation of energy equation: KEi + Ugi = KEf + KEf(rotational) + Ugf, which simplifies the problem and leads to the correct time of descent of 2.06 seconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of kinetic and potential energy
  • Knowledge of rotational dynamics and torque
  • Ability to solve algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn how to apply Newton's second law in multi-body systems
  • Explore the principles of rotational motion and torque
  • Practice solving physics problems involving pulleys and inclined planes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in mastering the principles of energy conservation and dynamics in mechanical systems.

zewei1988
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the system shown in the figure with m1 = 23.00 kg, m2 = 13.60 kg, R = 0.13 m, and the mass of the uniform pulley M = 5.00 kg. Object m2 is resting on the floor, and object m1 is 5.00 m above the floor when it is released from rest. The pulley axis is frictionless. The cord is light, does not stretch, and does not slip on the pulley.


Homework Equations


KEi + Ugi = KEf + KEf(rotational) + Ugf


The Attempt at a Solution


Initially I keep trying to solve the problem by using free body diagrams and finding the acceleration. But all my answers were wrong.
However, I saw someone posted this question on yahoo answers and the solution he got was by using conservation of energy.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090423164312AAs5DN8"

I do not see the difference in using the conservation of energy method and my method. Can someone enlighten me? This topic is killing me. haha
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should get the same answer either way. Post your calculations so we can see where your attempt went wrong.
 
vela said:
You should get the same answer either way. Post your calculations so we can see where your attempt went wrong.

Ok, here are my workings:


Eqn 1:
23(9.8) - T1 = 23a
T1 = 225.4 - 23a

Eqn2:
T2 = 13.6a + 133

Eqn3:
0.13T1 - 0.13T2 = (0.5 * 5 * 0.132) * (a / 0.13)
T1 - T2 = 2.5a

Sub Eqn2 and Eqn1 into Eqn3:
92.4 = 158.5a
a = 0.583 m/s2

5 = 0.5 * 0.583 * t2
t = 4.14s


The correct answer is 2.06s (about half the time I calculated).
 
zewei1988 said:
Ok, here are my workings:


Eqn 1:
23(9.8) - T1 = 23a
T1 = 225.4 - 23a

Eqn2:
T2 = 13.6a + 133

Eqn3:
0.13T1 - 0.13T2 = (0.5 * 5 * 0.132) * (a / 0.13)
T1 - T2 = 2.5a
Good up to here, but something went wrong when you plugged the numbers in.
Sub Eqn2 and Eqn1 into Eqn3:
92.4 = 158.5a
The coefficient of a should be the sum of the two masses and half the pulley's mass, 13.60+23.00+0.5(5.00)=39.10 kg, not 158.5 kg.

One suggestion I have is to not plug any numbers in until the end. You probably could have avoided the error in this particular case.
a = 0.583 m/s2

5 = 0.5 * 0.583 * t2
t = 4.14s


The correct answer is 2.06s (about half the time I calculated).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K