Why Should You Study Feynman Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion emphasizes the significance of studying Feynman Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, particularly for graduate students pursuing High Energy Physics or condensed matter theory. While many working physicists may not utilize this formulation in their research, understanding path-dependent processes is crucial for mastering the field. The text referenced is "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by R. Shankar, which is suitable for upper-division undergraduates or first-semester graduate students. Engaging with this material can enhance one's grasp of quantum mechanics and its applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Quantum Mechanics concepts
  • Understanding of the Calculus of Variations
  • Basic knowledge of High Energy Physics
  • Exposure to classical mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Feynman Path Integrals in detail
  • Explore the Calculus of Variations and its applications
  • Research Quantum Gravity theories and their relation to path integrals
  • Review classical mechanics to understand its connection to quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, particularly those interested in High Energy Physics or condensed matter theory, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of quantum mechanics and path-dependent processes.

ptabor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
My QM prof skipped over the topic of the Feynman Path integral formulation...

Is this material important enough that I should learn it on my own (personal curiosity aside)?

The Text is Principles of Quantum Mechanics by R. Shankar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the level of the course? I assume either upper div. undergrad or 1st semester grad.

If you're an undergrad, I wouldn't worry about it yet. If you're a grad student and you're pretty sure you want to do High Energy then it would be worth your time to get starting learning the material.

But most working physicists don't use Feynman path integrals in their research, so it's not so necessary that you run out and learn it now.

Of course, if you're really curious, then it doesn't matter how important it is...just see what you can pick up.
 
HonkyTonk said:
If you're a grad student and you're pretty sure you want to do High Energy ...
or condensed matter theory
...then it would be worth your time to get starting learning the material.
 
Just ask him to teach you.
 
ptabor said:
My QM prof skipped over the topic of the Feynman Path integral formulation...

Is this material important enough that I should learn it on my own (personal curiosity aside)?

if you consider yourself a physics person... you should at least know the ideas behind it
 
no, since feynman was a moron, compared to those of us posting anonymously of PF, his ideas can safely be ignored.
 
mathwonk said:
no, since feynman was a moron, compared to those of us posting anonymously of PF, his ideas can safely be ignored.

I take it this is supposed to be humorous?
 
mathwonk said:
no, since feynman was a moron, compared to those of us posting anonymously of PF, his ideas can safely be ignored.
:smile:

I take it this is supposed to be humorous?
He just being sarcastically contrarian. :biggrin:

Path integrals are important, and more generally, understanding path dependent processes and states is exceedingly important if one wants to be really good in one's field, be it physics or engineering.
 
Path integrals are important, and more generally, understanding path dependent processes and states is exceedingly important if one wants to be really good in one's field, be it physics or engineering.

Very well said, and so those who are either pragmatic or curious would do well to both read up on Feynman path integrals as well as the Calculus of Variations.
 
  • #10
Some might argue that [in spite of current mathematical difficulties] Path Integrals may be more fundamental [for (say) Quantum Gravity] than "standard" approaches to Quantum Mechanics.
 
  • #11
Path integrals is doing quantum mechanics when you are doing classical mechanics. see Feynman and Hibbs
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K