Why the Stern-Gerlach experiment didn't detect the L?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Stern-Gerlach experiment, conducted by Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach in 1922, aimed to verify Bohr's principle of space quantization. Initially, it was believed that the experiment detected quantization of orbital angular momentum (L = 1, m = 1, -1), but the absence of a third line for m = 0 indicated otherwise. Subsequent experiments by Phipps and Taylor confirmed that the observed magnetic moments were due to spin angular momentum rather than orbital angular momentum. The choice of silver atoms for the experiment was likely not based on their electronic configuration, as the understanding of such configurations was not yet established.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly space quantization.
  • Familiarity with angular momentum in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of atomic structure and electronic configurations.
  • Basic grasp of experimental physics, specifically the Stern-Gerlach apparatus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of quantum mechanics related to space quantization.
  • Study the Stern-Gerlach experiment in detail, including its methodology and implications.
  • Explore the significance of spin angular momentum in quantum physics.
  • Investigate alternative atomic candidates for similar experiments and their expected outcomes.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists interested in experimental physics, and educators teaching the principles of angular momentum and atomic structure.

patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
in the stern gerlash experiment why didn't they detect the magnetic moments originated from the orbital angular momentum ?
Relevant Equations
μ = q/2m L
i recently read about the stern-gerlach experiment and found out that they did it in the first place to verify the principle of the "space quantization " introduced by Bohr , and they thought they did detect the quantization of the orbital angular momentum of ( L = 1 , m = 1,-1 ) neglecting the fact that they didn't found a third line associated with the m = 0 , and later on after Phipps and Taylor's experiment they detect a slimier two spots for hydrogen which indicated that , what had been found in the original S-G experiment was the magnetic moment due to spin angular momentum .
my question is : why didn't they detect the magnetic moment due to the orbital angular momentum in the original S-G experiment ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It could simply be that their apparatus was not sufficiently sensitive enough and if they did see anything couldn’t decide if it was some form of statistical error in measurement or a real effect.
 
What orbital angular momentum? Silver is [Kr], with L=0, 4d10 with L=0, and 5S1, with L = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Vanadium 50 said:
What orbital angular momentum? Silver is [Kr], with L=0, 4d10 with L=0, and 5S1, with L = 0.
ok! that make sense thanks , but that raise a question on my mind , why would they choose silver atoms as a subject for the experiment to verify angular momentum quantization ?! or they simply didn't know 🤔 that it just didn't have orbital angular momentum .
another question : had they have choose another atoms , they would really verify space quantization right . or the addition of orbital and spin angular momentum would make a mixture of states with different net angular momenta and they would have got some strange results .
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Stern proposed the experiment in 1921 and Gerlach performed it in 1922, so they were doing it before the Schroedinger Equation and modern atomic theory. Whatever caused them to pick silver was certainly not its electronic configuration, since that hadn't been worked out yet.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: patric44 and etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K