High School Why Use Dot Product vs. Cross Product for Vector Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikhil faraday
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Vector
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the use of dot and cross products in vector calculations, emphasizing that they serve different purposes based on the context. The dot product is used for scalar quantities like work, while the cross product applies to rotational quantities such as torque and angular velocity. Angular velocity is represented as a vector to convey both the rate of rotation and the axis of rotation, following the right-hand rule for direction. The distinction between polar vectors (displacement) and axial vectors (rotation) is highlighted, with angular quantities requiring directional representation to fully describe their behavior. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately modeling physical situations involving rotation and force.
Nikhil faraday
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Why some quantities are multiplied by using dot product and some by cross product ? Like work done is calculated by scalar product of force and displacement while torque is calculated by vector product of force and position vector?? Why do we give directions to quantities like angular velocity , angular acceleration? What is the significance of giving them directions? HELP !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope, it's intuitively clear to you that angular velocity and angular acceleration have to do with rotations. For anular velocity it's very simple to see since its magnitude is just the angle something is rotating per unit time. Now that doesn't tell you everything about the rotation but you need to know around which axis the thing is rotating, and that's given by a vector. So the angular velocity is vector ##\vec{\omega}##, but it has not the meaning of vectors like a usual velocity of giving a direction something is "displaced" from one position to another but it indicates rotation. So you need a rule how to define the rotation axis in terms of a vector, and that's the right-hand rule. It says to get the rotation, point the thumb of your right hand in direction of ##\vec{\omega}##. Then your fingers give the sense of rotation.

To dinstinguish these two kinds of vectors one usually calls the vectors describing displacements (or translation) as polar vectors and those indicating a rotation in the above sense axial vectors. Thus quantities related to relations like angular velocity, angular momentum, torque etc. are axial vectors.

As you also realized, the cross product has something to do with rotations too. That's a bit more involved. To explain it I'd need calculus, and I'm not sure whether you already have learned this.
 
Angular velocity (or angular momentum) is not just a number, it has an associated "sense of rotation". If you set a bicycle wheel spinning, the spinning is characterized by: (1) the plane it is spinning in, (2) the rate that it is spinning (how many times per second does it spin completely around). For spinning in 3-dimensional space, you can use a vector, \vec{\omega} to convey these two pieces of information. The direction of \vec{\omega} is the axis of rotation (which is perpendicular to the plane of rotation), and the magnitude of \vec{\omega} is proportional to the rate of spinning.

By the way, angular velocity being represented as a vector with 3 components is kind of quirk of 3-dimensional space. In 2 dimensions, angular velocity has only one component. In 3 dimensions, it has 3 components. In 4 dimensions, it has 6 components. The general formula is that it has \frac{n(n-1)}{2} components in n-dimensional space.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Nikhil faraday said:
Why some quantities are multiplied by using dot product and some by cross product ?
Asking why sometimes we use the dot product and sometimes we use the cross product is like asking why sometimes we use a hammer and sometimes we use a screwdriver - they're different tools used for different purposes, and you'll find both of them in a well-stocked toolbox.

There are lots of things you can do to combine two vectors; you can calculate the dot product, you can calculate the cross product, you can add them together, you can subtract one from the other. These are four different tools used for four different purposes, and with practice you develop a sense of which one works to describe a particular physical situation. Chances are that you've already learned to recognize problems that call for vector addition - vector addition is easy to visualize. The dot product and the cross product are a bit harder to visualize and come a bit later in your studies, but like a hammer and a screwdriver, the more you see them being used the better you'll get at recognizing situations that call for one or the other.
Why do we give directions to quantities like angular velocity , angular acceleration? What is the significance of giving them directions?
Let's use angular velocity as an example, because it's easy to visualize. I have a ball, and it's spinning around a vertical axis at 1000 RPM. I have another ball and its spinning about a horizontal axis at 1000 RPM. They have the same amount of spin, but it's in different directions; to completely describe the spin of the two balls I need both a number (1000 RPM) and direction (vertical versus horizontal). So your question "Why do we give directions to quantities like angular velocity" is backwards - we don't "give" them direction, they already have direction, so we are forced to use mathematical descriptions that include that direction.

(As an aside, this trick of using vectors to represent rotations and angular velocities and the like only works in three dimensions. However, we live in a three-dimensional world, so it works for us - and all that's we require of our tools).
[Edit: and thanks to @stevendaryl for reminding me of this]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
25K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K