Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Why use velocity dispersion in Faber Jackson relation

  1. Jun 5, 2017 #1
    Hi all,

    Recently I am reading some online material about Tully-Fisher relation and Faber-Jackson relation
    which is describing the dynamical constrain on the mass of spiral/elliptical galaxies.

    In spiral galaxy, TF relation suggest Luminsoty ≈ (some const) (Vmax)^4
    while in elliptical galaxy the Vmax term become the σ, which is the velocity dispersion.

    I know that the assumptions behind are a little bit different. For example in TF relation we assume (L/M) ratio is independent of M while in FJ relation it is not. I also understand that in reality stars in elliptical galaxy just move in random direction rather than systematically move in a disk.

    Therefore in the case of elliptical galaxies we can only talk about velocity dispersion σ, rather than just velocity itself. However I don't know why is the TF and FJ relation looks so similar. Are they by coincidence? Or there is physical justification behind replacing the V by σ in TF relation and you get the FJ relation?

    Thanks for your patience and help. :)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 10, 2017 #2
    Thanks for the thread! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post? The more details the better.
     
  4. Jun 10, 2017 #3

    stefan r

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I believe we just measure the width of a characteristic peak. If the galaxy is a point source you would get photons from a random selection of stars.

    My analytic chemistry professor told me that they used to cut out the peak with scissors. Then they would weight the paper. This was before computers were around to do the integration.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Why use velocity dispersion in Faber Jackson relation
  1. Velocity Dispersion (Replies: 11)

  2. Faber Jackson relation (Replies: 4)

  3. Velocity Dispersion (Replies: 2)

Loading...