Why vector lengths may not be preserved?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensors Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the preservation of vector lengths under different metrics in mathematical spaces. It clarifies that a metric is a type (0,2) tensor and not a scalar, emphasizing that the preservation of length is contingent upon the existence of a single metric. An example provided illustrates the difference between metrics, such as the distance between two real numbers and the discrete metric, highlighting that two different metrics can yield non-equivalent results. The conclusion asserts that without a single metric, the concept of length cannot be consistently defined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor mathematics, specifically (0,2) tensors.
  • Familiarity with metric spaces and their properties.
  • Knowledge of scalar functions and their implications in metric definitions.
  • Basic concepts of vector spaces and length definitions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of (0,2) tensors in differential geometry.
  • Explore various types of metrics in metric spaces, including discrete and continuous metrics.
  • Learn about the implications of scalar functions on metric transformations.
  • Investigate the relationship between vector spaces and their corresponding metrics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students in advanced mathematics who are exploring the concepts of metrics, vector spaces, and tensor analysis.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Given some metric, what is an example where the length of a vector is not preserved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume it's because a metric could have a scalar and that would not preserve the length.
 
Nusc said:
Given some metric, what is an example where the length of a vector is not preserved?
Not preserved under what?
 
Your question is rather ill defined. Preserved when exactly?

It is also not clear what you would mean by a ”metric having a scalar”. A metric is a type (0,2) tensor, not a scalar.
 
fresh_42 said:
Not preserved under what?
length
 
Orodruin said:
Your question is rather ill defined. Preserved when exactly?

It is also not clear what you would mean by a ”metric having a scalar”. A metric is a type (0,2) tensor, not a scalar.
if you define a metric g' = k g where k is some scalar function. you can expresss the lengths of a' = g' a_i a_j = k g a_i a_j
 
You need a metric in order to speak of length, not the other way around. If you have two different metrics, they might be equivalent ##g'=k\cdot g##, or not. The question about length is directly coupled to the existence of a metric - one metric. As an example you could consider the distance between two real numbers as ##|x-y|## or look at the discrete metric ##d(x,y)=1## as soon as ##x\neq y##. These are two different, non-equivalent metrics on one space, ##\mathbb{R}## in this case.

So as long as you only have one metric on a vectorspace, you cannot have two lengths.
 
I see. thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K