Why Was Darwen Wrong About Sexual Selection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Persefone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the perceived errors in Charles Darwin's views on sexual selection, exploring the reasons behind these claims and the implications of sexual selection in evolutionary theory. Participants engage with the historical context of Darwin's ideas and their relevance to contemporary understandings of mate selection and reproductive strategies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Darwin's claims about sexual selection were based on incomplete knowledge, leading to potential errors in his conclusions.
  • Others propose that sexual selection is fundamentally tied to maximizing offspring survivability and reproductive potential, though this may vary across different contexts.
  • A viewpoint is raised that individuals may seek partners resembling their parents due to evolutionary success, although this may not hold true in modern environments.
  • Some participants question whether mate selection is influenced by subconscious evaluations of a partner's potential to contribute to offspring success, suggesting that social contexts can alter traditional fitness characteristics.
  • A participant mentions that Darwin included sexual selection in his evolutionary model, contrasting it with other biologists of his time who favored direct competition models.
  • Concerns are expressed about the lack of specific examples or references to support claims that Darwin was wrong, highlighting a need for clearer arguments in the discussion.
  • One participant notes that Darwin's observations may have been limited to his time and context, suggesting that evolving understandings of species diversity could challenge his theories in the future.
  • Another participant discusses the male peacock's tail as a potential disadvantage for survival, yet argues it serves as an indicator of health and vigor to females.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether Darwin was wrong about sexual selection. Multiple competing views are presented, with some defending Darwin's ideas while others critique them based on modern interpretations and observations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about specific claims made by Darwin regarding sexual selection, indicating a lack of detailed knowledge about his original texts. There is also mention of the influence of societal factors on biological instincts, which complicates the discussion of sexual selection.

  • #31
Danger said:
I'm just going to put this in my terms and let the censor software deal with it. As a general rule, women **** for flash and marry for cash. They want the macho jerk to impregnate them, and then let the ugly rich guy deal with raising the kid.

Well, you use more asterisks then me anyway. The women wish to bear healthy children that survive. How that's accomplished is of secondary concern.

"she purposefully pursues him and wins for her prize, his dominant genes for her offspring", Stacy Keech, talking about elephants.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
Danger said:
I'm just going to put this in my terms and let the censor software deal with it. As a general rule, women **** for flash and marry for cash. They want the macho jerk to impregnate them, and then let the ugly rich guy deal with raising the kid.
I don't think so, the broken relationship you mentioned, and if I am not mistaken, is due to the man's "choosey" nature and also because his wife couldn't put up with such a "him" anymore not because of the fact that he is rich, I believe.
Fame and money are what most people try to earn, and they sure become main targets for social selection in human society, which explains for my assumption.
I think one of the main points distinguished humans and other animals in selecting a mate lies in there also...
 
  • #33
Emieno said:
Fame and money are what most people try to earn.

Francis Fukuyama wrote "The End of History and The Last Man". He emphasized the point that we all struggle for recognition. He proposed that we live in a world of masters and slaves: "masters" will fight to the death for recognition; "slaves" . . . will not.
 
  • #34
In humans, a case can be made for sexual selection. The shape of a woman's hips is an erotic trigger for we men, and it is an indication that the hips are wide enough for a decent birth canal to function and produce a live baby. Ample breasts are another trigger and they are needed to nurse the baby. An ample buttock stores energy reserves and the back curve indicates a balanced spine. bow legs, skinny calves and other disfiguring characteristics are indications of misuse, mal nutrition, or genetic defect.

We men do seek what is physically healthy, but we are certainly at least as concerned over the personality! It too has a selective basis---at least to me. I don't know if this has been researched, but in my case perhaps we can see an example of what I am talking about. I have no patience with stupid women, but that does not mean I want one who claims to be smarter than myself. This may seem a paradox to you all, but the fact is that a very smart woman can be very feminine and, hence, very attractive. I am not saying their femininess is "put on." It is only attractive if it is genuine. Men are not that easily fooled.

charles
http://humanpurpose.simplenet.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K