Why were Buckyballs banned by the government?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the controversy surrounding Buckyballs, a magnetic toy that has been linked to serious injuries in children and teenagers who accidentally swallow the magnets. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has filed a lawsuit against the manufacturer, citing the product as defective due to its potential dangers. Participants debate the responsibility of parents versus the need for regulations to protect children from such hazards. Some argue that the product is not intended for children and that parents should supervise their kids more closely, while others contend that the inherent danger of these magnets is not obvious to the average consumer. The conversation also touches on broader issues of product safety, the role of government in regulating potentially harmful items, and the balance between personal responsibility and consumer protection. The discussion highlights the complexities of defining dangerous products and the implications of banning items based on their potential risks.
  • #91
Danger said:
Quiet, you! This is no place for logic.

Darn! Why didn't someone tell me earlier? :redface:

This thread shows me why politics takes years (I'll revisit this thread after a couple of years when a consensus is reached)! It has also showed me why I decided not to go into politics. :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
DaveC426913 said:
It is disingenuous of you to cherry pick parts of my argument, eliminate them, then substitute your own words. It is also an indication that you have no better argument than to put words in my mouth.

I was trying to have an intelligent discussion and encourage people see an alternate point of view than the self-reinforcing one they usually stick with. But I'm not up for schoolyard arguing tactics.

:raspberry:
I am specifically responding to your post.

DaveC426913 said:
And I do believe that, as a part of society, we are supposed to come together to help each other from harm.

In the marine world there's a saying: When an accident happens, it's everyone's fault.

So stop the schoolyard tactics dave, you been warned before about your inability to stop the "devil's advocate" nonsense. Arguing just for the sake of arguing. Stop it.
 
  • #93
DaveC426913 said:
It was an attempt at levity, to prevent the thread from going sour.
The thread is being looked at by the mentors now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 270 ·
10
Replies
270
Views
30K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
5K