News Why Would an Adult Target Kindergarten Students in a Shooting?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack21222
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A tragic school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, has resulted in the deaths of 27 people, including 18 children, primarily in a kindergarten classroom. The gunman, who is reported dead, had connections to the school through his mother, a teacher there. The incident has sparked intense discussions about gun violence and the societal implications of such acts, with many expressing disbelief and horror at the targeting of young children. Some participants in the discussion highlight the need for urgent action to address gun-related issues in America, while others reflect on the broader nature of human violence. The emotional impact on families and communities is profound, with many struggling to comprehend the tragedy.
  • #181


Drakkith said:
I know that I don't know. I suggest everyone think long and hard about how far you would be willing to go and ask yourself if you are willing to give up freedoms YOU like in the name of safety. Because I believe that is the issue here.

This does bring the whole thread of discussion full circle. It's worth asking if giving up additional freedoms will make you more secure as well, before considering giving them up. For that matter, you need to ask, secure against what? In some cases, especially the gun control argument, more security against one type of threat leads directly to less security against another kind.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #182


What bothers me most is that there are people out there who feel completely comfortable with a loss of life such as this being an acceptable price of admission for gun freedom.
 
  • #183


encorp said:
What bothers me most is that there are people out there who feel completely comfortable with a loss of life such as this being an acceptable price of admission for gun freedom.

I haven't heard of anyone expressing such a feeling, though there are many who believe that had that freedom been less restricted than it is, that this tragedy would have been averted.
 
  • #184


encorp said:
What bothers me most is that there are people out there who feel completely comfortable with a loss of life such as this being an acceptable price of admission for gun freedom.

And some people are bothered that there are people out there who are completely comfortable with banning guns just because a small portion of people overall do bad things with them.
 
  • #185


justsomeguy said:
This does bring the whole thread of discussion full circle. It's worth asking if giving up additional freedoms will make you more secure as well, before considering giving them up. For that matter, you need to ask, secure against what? In some cases, especially the gun control argument, more security against one type of threat leads directly to less security against another kind.


Actually no, the question will turn out to be do we give up high capacity magazines for the ones we all used a few years back before the high capacity magazines became available.

The original purpose of the NRA was to teach young American males to be better marksmen. More recently that bastardized into spraying as much lead as possible, when the profit potential became obvious.
 
  • #186


edward said:
Actually no, the question will turn out to be do we give up high capacity magazines for the ones we all used a few years back before the high capacity magazines became available.
Who's "we all"? I've had so called "high capacity" magazines my entire life.

The original purpose of the NRA was to teach young American males to be better marksmen. More recently that bastardized into spraying as much lead as possible, when the profit potential became obvious.

The NRA has always been about protecting the second amendment, but what's that got to do with anything?
 
  • #187


justsomeguy said:
This does bring the whole thread of discussion full circle. It's worth asking if giving up additional freedoms will make you more secure as well, before considering giving them up. For that matter, you need to ask, secure against what? In some cases, especially the gun control argument, more security against one type of threat leads directly to less security against another kind.

When you see a defacto police state like China having the same problems it makes you think about how effective the tradition containment solutions of "limits on weapons" and government people control will be in controlling these types of events. They have restrictions on the length of knives you can buy without having to register them with their national identity cards and overall crime is low but mass attacks still happen with frightening frequency there.
 
  • #188


nsaspook said:
When you see a defacto police state like China having the same problems it makes you think about how effective the tradition containment solutions of "limits on weapons" and government people control will be in controlling these types of events. They have restrictions on the length of knives you can buy without having to register them with their national identity cards and overall crime is low but mass attacks still happen with frightening frequency there.
But fatalities are limited.

Let's not make this another "gun thread" as they very quickly get closed as people become overly emotional.

Discussion needs to be about the shooter, you can discuss his use of his guns specifically, his family, and the impact on the community.

Thanks.
 
  • #189


"make weapons less available...I don't give two hoots about people that enjoy shooting" gets an "excellent post, thank you" but refutation of that position gets a "lets not make this about guns?" Sorry, but I'm smelling a double standard.
 
  • #190


justsomeguy said:
"make weapons less available...I don't give two hoots about people that enjoy shooting" gets an "excellent post, thank you" but refutation of that position gets a "lets not make this about guns?" Sorry, but I'm smelling a double standard.
I can lock the thread now and go back and delete every off topic post in this thread and reduce it to two pages, or I can request that the thread get back on topic before it gets locked.

Which do you prefer?
 
  • #191


Evo said:
I can lock the thread now and go back and delete every off topic post in this thread and reduce it to two pages, or I can request that the thread get back on topic before it gets locked.

Which do you prefer?

Either is fine. What I'm raising a flag over is you participating in the line of discussion you're asking to be stopped. I expect you to enforce the rules of course. I don't expect you to do so only when the comments disagree with your personal positions.

The warning, I must say, was entirely expected.
 
  • #192


justsomeguy said:
Either is fine. What I'm raising a flag over is you participating in the line of discussion you're asking to be stopped. I expect you to enforce the rules of course. I don't expect you to do so only when the comments disagree with your personal positions.

The warning, I must say, was entirely expected.
Many people have expressed their opinion, including me. When the thread starts to get too derailed, it's time to bring it back. This is not my first request to get back on topic.
 
  • #193


We should probably always create parallel threads for these sorts of things: one to talk about the incident itself, one to talk about gun control.
 
  • #194


russ_watters said:
We should probably always create parallel threads for these sorts of things: one to talk about the incident itself, one to talk about gun control.
We've had too many gun control threads and recently. Another is not going to go anywhere the previous haven't gone. So, no gun control threads until a new law is proposed that could change things and that bears discussing.
 
  • #195


arildno said:
This is a dreadful event, and my condolences to all Americans in general.
Thanks Arildno.
 
  • #196


Pythagorean said:
My guess at the majority of violent crime in the US:

Parents in neglected communities who have to work hard leave their kids to run the neighborhood; education system (or lack of) in a neglected area doesn't make the most effective child care. Children get raised by other children who have children before they become adults. Emotions and tribal behavior dominate the culture. Warped sense of family values and no education.

For the most part, I agree.
 
  • #197


CAC1001 said:
These are the types of people who claim God will punish America for embracing gay marriage (like the Chick-Fil-A guy).
"the types of people"?

No, Huckabee is not a Falwell, God-will-punish-you type of homophobe.
 
  • #198


CAC1001 said:
... All one needs is one rifle or handgun to go and commit a mass killing.
With a bolt action only rifle, even a very high powered model, a mass killing would require a fairly high degree of planning, skill, and probably training, especially indoors.
 
  • #200


mheslep said:
With a bolt action only rifle, even a very high powered model, a mass killing would require a fairly high degree of planning, skill, and probably training, especially indoors.
My hunting rifle is a Ruger Model 1 chambered for .45-70. If you need more than one shot, you shouldn't be shooting at deer. One shot, one deer.

I have no particular beef against semi-automatic rifles with clips, but anybody who has to own a rifle styled like a military issue (M16 or AK47 for instance) has issues. One of the companies I consulted with many years back was Bushmaster, with a plant in southern Maine. The manager was quite proud of their ability to produce accurized and heavy fluted target barrels. That's all well and good, but most of their clientele wanted the Bushmasters because they looked "bad".

I don't want a fringe of gun-owners to ruin it for the rest of us.

BTW, the sicko could have killed a lot of kids with very old technology, if he had wanted. I sold my collection of antique Winchester lever actions years back to buy a couple of Canon cameras and some lenses. Some of those Winchesters were deadly tack-drivers. .38-55 is not such a popular caliber these days, but out on the target range, it was impossible to beat. You don't need to have a Bushmaster to kill a whole bunch of people. I probably won't be able to watch the evening news for the rest of the week, while idiots blather about the killer's arsenal and re-trace his route through the school. [rant mode off]
 
Last edited:
  • #201


Obviously being autistic was not the issue, we don't even know if he had autism spectrum disorder, he apparently had at least one mental disorder that caused him to be violent that would be outside of the autism spectrum. We don't even know if the mother had him diagnosed or sought professional help for him. She might have been ashamed and just hoped people didn't find out. IMO.

My question is why, since this mother obviously knew her son had serious problems, as is referenced in the article below, would she give him guns? If this woman was alive, I wouldn't be surprised if she would be charged for her role in giving her underaged mentally ill son access to such an enormous amount of ammunition in addition to the guns.

Nancy Lanza, whose gun collection was raided by her son Adam for Friday’s massacre at Sandy Hook school, was part of the “prepper” movement, which urges readiness for social chaos by hoarding supplies and training with weapons.

“She prepared for the worst,” her sister-in-law Marsha Lanza told reporters. “Last time we visited her in person, we talked about prepping – are you ready for what could happen down the line, when the economy collapses?”

It also emerged that Mrs Lanza had spoken of her fears less than a week before the attack that she was “losing” her son. “She said it was getting worse.
continued...

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/nancy_lanza_was_a_prepper/singleton/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #202


There are degrees of preparation. (not that I ever thought of it that way) One of my great-aunts was never without at least 100# of flour and probably 50# of sugar, and a truck-load of canned goods. Her house was tidy and neat, but head down into the cellar and be prepared to be inundated with staple foods. Suffering through the Depression and struggling to feed one's kids can do that, I guess.

Her male progeny and my mother's brothers were well-armed. though. We needed to hunt to have meat. When I was old enough to be trusted, my father told me that I had only rarely eaten beef before then because he and my older male relatives routinely poached moose to feed us. They couldn't afford to buy us beef.
 
  • #203
turbo said:
There are degrees of preparation. (not that I ever thought of it that way) One of my great-aunts was never without at least 100# of flour and probably 50# of sugar, and a truck-load of canned goods. Her house was tidy and neat, but head down into the cellar and be prepared to be inundated with staple foods. Suffering through the Depression and struggling to feed one's kids can do that, I guess.

Her male progeny and my mother's brothers were well-armed. though. We needed to hunt to have meat. When I was old enough to be trusted, my father told me that I had only rarely eaten beef before then because he and my older male relatives routinely poached moose to feed us. They couldn't afford to buy us beef.
This has nothing to do with fearing a "doomsday" event, or as her sister described her
Marsha Lanza told the Chicago Sun-Times that Nancy Lanza wanted guns for protection. "She prepared for the worst," Marsha Lanza told the newspaper. "I didn't know that they (the guns) would be used on her."

http://news.yahoo.com/gunmans-mother-kept-trials-home-life-hidden-010414000.html

She was rich. Please don't make off topic posts.
 
  • #204


There is still a lot we on the outside do not know regarding the precursors to the tragedy of last Friday. It will take time for the authorities to do their investigation.

The tragedy, the loss of innocent life, is for many of us beyond words. Future actions will not resurrect those 20 children and 6 adults.

Beyond the grief, we perhaps can look forward for ways to prevent such occurrences in the future. That is the topic of a different thread.


Reflecting of the past 3 days, I think we need to maintain a healthy amount of skepticism at what is being reported in the media (the details changed so often, and erroneous information was presented), and to the extent possible, maintain a rational perspective while absorbing the news of a heart-breaking, gut-wrenching event.

This morning the NY Times published the following:
Gunman Took Big Supply of Ammunition to School After Killing Mother at Home
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/nyregion/sandy-hook-school-shooting-in-newtown.html
Lt. J. Paul Vance, a spokesman for the Connecticut State Police, said most of the shots were fired from a .223 Bushmaster semiautomatic carbine, a military-style assault weapon. Mr. Lanza was also carrying two semiautomatic pistols, a 10-millimeter Glock and a 9-millimeter Sig Sauer. A shotgun was found in the car.

The guns were legally acquired and registered by Ms. Lanza, who had sometimes taken her son to shooting ranges, according to law enforcement officials and her friends. Mr. Lanza, who former classmates said had had a developmental disorder, lived with his mother.

While Lieutenant Vance said he did not yet know how many bullets had been fired, he did say investigators recovered “numerous” empty 30-round magazines for the Bushmaster rifle.
So it appears that the gunman had at least 4 guns, one which was left in the car, and he used the other 3, and mostly the semi-automatic carbine (assuming that's the right term).

And the investigation is ongoing -
Gunman’s computers may be key in Connecticut school shooting investigation
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout...-school-shooting-investigation-174438304.html
 
  • #206
Borg said:
The national news is reporting that the hard drive was removed and heavily damaged.
I read that in the media. We will have to wait for authorities to do their investigation. I also read the Adam Lanza used two bedrooms, and one was used to house his computer(s). Let's give them time.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/1...l-a-mystery-as-community-holds-first-funerals

A comment on APM's (NPR affiliate) Marketplace stated that it will take months to sort out all the details.


Meanwhile - In memory of the victims

Rachel D'Avino, 29, was a behavioral therapist who had just started working at Sandy Hook Elementary, according to her obituary published in the Waterbury Republican American. She was finishing her doctorate, and her boyfriend was getting ready to propose to her on Christmas Eve. Just days before Friday's massacre, D'Avino's 27-year-old boyfriend, Anthony Cerritelli, had asked her parents for permission to pop the question to their daughter. :frown:

The funerals of Noah Pozner and Jack Pinto were held today. Peace be upon them and their families.
http://www.dariennewsonline.com/local/article/Funerals-held-for-Noah-Pozner-Jack-Pinto-4123833.php

Image of 12 of 20 child victims: http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/R...0J9I00_RTROPTP_2_USA-SHOOTING-CONNECTICUT.JPG

Newtown Couple Vow to Live for Dead Daughter, Jessica Rekos
http://gma.yahoo.com/newtown-couple-vow-live-dead-daughter-113812032--abc-news-topstories.html

and neighbor, Gene Rosen, took 6 young survivors into his home
http://news.yahoo.com/neighbor-took-6-young-survivors-home-205020443.html
Rosen, a 69-year-old retired psychologist, took the four girls and two boys into his home, and over the next few hours gave them toys, listened to their stories and called their frantic parents.


Let me express my appreciation to JetBlue and Delta Airlines!
Noah's family wanted letters from his friends and family buried with him, and now thanks to social media and the compassion displayed by one airline, the Pozner family's wish will be granted.

On Sunday, Noah's aunt, Victoria Haller, tweeted to Delta and JetBlue asking for help getting letters from her 5-year-old son, who lives in Seattle with her, to Connecticut in time for today's funeral. Both airlines responded. Delta tweeted back a phone number to its cargo department. JetBlue tweeted Haller back asking for her number so they could get in touch with her.

. . . .
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/trendin...-wish-sandy-hook-victim-family-202004360.html


Kindly ignore the members of Westboro Baptist who plan to picket the funerals. :rolleyes: :mad:
 
Last edited:
  • #207


BillHampton said:
Evil people will do evil things. Like over in China where they seem to have a knife stabbing problem. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2012/12/14/china-school-stabbings/1770395/ A stabbing spree killed 20 and injured over 50 into 2010 , and now once again another stabbing takes place this time only injuring some students.

So basically, what I'm trying to get at is if you take away the guns. Disturbed people will find other ways to commit these acts of violence.

That has never been in question. The only salient point is how much damage can someone cause with a gun vs a knife.

It is true that "guns don't kill people, people kill people." But guns make it a whole lot easier for some people to kill a whole lot more people in a much shorter time.
 
  • #208
Evo said:
My question is why, since this mother obviously knew her son had serious problems, as is referenced in the article below, would she give him guns? If this woman was alive, I wouldn't be surprised if she would be charged for her role in giving her underaged mentally ill son access to such an enormous amount of ammunition in addition to the guns.
This may be part of the answer.
AP via Yahoo said:
Hanoman said Nancy Lanza told him she introduced guns to Adam as a way to teach him responsibility.

"Guns require a lot of respect, and she really tried to instill that responsibility within him, and he took to it. He loved being careful with them. He made it a source of pride," he said.
http://news.yahoo.com/gunmans-mother-kept-trials-home-life-hidden-010414000.html
 
  • #209


Evil people will do evil things. Like over in China where they seem to have a knife stabbing problem. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...bings/1770395/ A stabbing spree killed 20 and injured over 50 into 2010 , and now once again another stabbing takes place this time only injuring some students.

So basically, what I'm trying to get at is if you take away the guns. Disturbed people will find other ways to commit these acts of violence.

Your statement that "a stabbing spree" killed 20 is incorrect. Five separate stabbing sprees in China in 2010 killed 20.

Other ways to commit these acts of violence can be deadly, but don't kill so many so fast.

Likewise, the deadliest (Michigan, 1927) included explosives. Yet they aren't used as often because they're harder to get than guns.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

News Bush Honest & Trustworthy Until How Many Lies?
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
News Patriot Act 2: Summarized by Alex Jones
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K