Why would FTL not be possible even in a noiseless place?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter San K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Ftl
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of faster-than-light (FTL) communication using entangled photons, even in a noiseless environment. It explores a hypothetical scenario where Alice sends entangled photons to Bob and Charlie, utilizing a Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser setup. Despite the absence of noise, the entanglement does not allow Alice and Bob to control the outcome of the photon detection without disrupting the entanglement, thus preventing FTL communication. The conclusion is that entanglement cannot be used for FTL information transfer due to the inherent limitations of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum entanglement and its implications
  • Familiarity with the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment
  • Knowledge of photon behavior in interference patterns
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics and measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment in detail
  • Explore the principles of quantum entanglement and its limitations
  • Study the implications of measurement in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate alternative theories regarding FTL communication in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the fundamental limitations of quantum communication and the nature of entanglement.

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
I am illustrating this via both questions and an experiment both of which are conceptually are dealing with the same idea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincidence_counting_(physics )

Question:


1 a) if there were zero noise, and only single photon was sent, do we need a co-incidence counter?

1 b) is it practically possible to have zero noise?

2. if not, could we do FTL of information?


let's look at the below setup and tell me what i am missing (or wrong assumptions) in the logic below:

Alice, Bob and Charlie

Alice sends entangled photons to Bob and Charlie and a Delayed choice quantum eraser is setup between Bob and Charlie (and Alice).

Alice and Bob are sitting close by while Charlie is on a distant planet

Signal photon is going towards Bob and Idler towards Charlie

its decided that:

if Alice wants to communicate 1 to Charlie she creates a no-which-way pattern (interference)

if Alice wants to communicate 0 to Charlie she creates a which-way pattern (no-interference)

so now to communicate to Charlie, Alice and Bob work with the signal photon.

they want to send the information digit 1 to say Charlie FTL, so they pass the photon through the polarizer setup such that which-way info is erased.

Now when Charlie looks at his photon's behavior he sees that the photon is detected on the interference pattern bands...i.e. the photon lands up on one of the intereference bands...on his detector D

Note: before this was done, a million photons were sent earlier and thus the bands were formed...and marked on the detector.

Now after that...the above experiment was done where only 1 single photon was sent.

Since there is no noise (i.e. no photons from outside the experiement striking the detector) Charlie (alice and bob) don't need a co-incidence counter.

All charlie does is...watch where the photon struck. Did the photon lie on the interference band/fringes or between them? and he would know (with higher than 50% probability) what was done to the signal photon by alice and bob.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This approach fails for the same reason that so many other attempts to use entanglement for FTL communication fail: Alice and Bob cannot control the behavior of their particle without interacting with it and ending the entanglement. Thus Charlie will see the same pattern no matter what Alice and Bob do, and the effects of the entanglement will only be apparent when they compare notes after the fact.

(It is possible for Alice and Bob to things that affect the pattern that Charles observes - trivially they could block on of the slits - but in this case the message is being by carried by the photons themselves so there is no FTL involved).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K