Wick rotation and contour integral

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of Wick rotation in the context of contour integrals in the complex plane. Participants explore the conditions under which a contour integral can be rotated from the real axis to the imaginary axis, specifically addressing the implications of fast vanishing integrands and the presence of poles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the fast vanishing of the integrand is a necessary condition for performing Wick rotation.
  • Others argue that the condition of not passing over any poles during the contour rotation is separate from the fast vanishing condition.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding the necessity of the fast vanishing condition for Wick rotation and seeks clarification.
  • Another participant suggests that if the integral vanishes fast toward infinity, the contributions from large semicircles become negligible, allowing for analytic continuation from the real to the imaginary axis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between fast vanishing conditions and the avoidance of poles during contour rotation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise nature of these conditions and their implications for Wick rotation.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the specific integrals being discussed and the nature of the poles involved in the contour integration.

koolmodee
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
We have an integral over q from -\infty to +\infty as a contour integral in the complex q plane. If the integrand vanishes fast enough as the absolute value of q goes to infinity, we can rotate this contour counterclockwise by 90 degrees, so that it runs from -i\infty to +i\infty.
In making this, the contour does not pass over any poles. Why?

When I make a contour integral, the big semi-circle that I use in the upper half has the -x+iy pole in it. How does the fast vanishing of the integral and the rotation make the integral not pass over the pole? I don't see it.

thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
koolmodee said:
We have an integral over q from -\infty to +\infty as a contour integral in the complex q plane. If the integrand vanishes fast enough as the absolute value of q goes to infinity, we can rotate this contour counterclockwise by 90 degrees, so that it runs from -i\infty to +i\infty.
In making this, the contour does not pass over any poles. Why?

When I make a contour integral, the big semi-circle that I use in the upper half has the -x+iy pole in it. How does the fast vanishing of the integral and the rotation make the integral not pass over the pole? I don't see it.

thank you
I think the fast vanishing of the integral is a required condition for performing Wick rotation. Only when the fast vanishing boundary condition is satisfied, one can perform the Wick rotation.
The condition that the rotation of the contour does not sweep through any poles is not a consequence of fast vanishing condition. Fast vanishing does not imply that the rotation sweeps no poles. Correctly speaking, the rotation passing through no poles is another condition one needs in order to be able to perform Wick rotation.
 
thanks ismaili!

I misread something in my book. It says the rotation does not pass over no pole ( in the specific integral given). I misunderstood that as after the rotation there are no poles in the contour.

But why is the fast vanishing of the integral necessary for Wick rotation?
 
koolmodee said:
thanks ismaili!

I misread something in my book. It says the rotation does not pass over no pole ( in the specific integral given). I misunderstood that as after the rotation there are no poles in the contour.

But why is the fast vanishing of the integral necessary for Wick rotation?
If the integral vanishes fast toward the infinity, the big semicircles contribute nothing so that the contour integral from -\infty to \infty in the real axis can be analytic continuated to the imaginary axis.
(This is my understanding, everyone is welcome to correct me or supplement.)
 
Makes sense.

thanks again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K